GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

Why I Hedge with Gold and Bitcoin

Loading ...Andrew Packer

November 1, 2024 • 4 minute, 51 second read


Why I Hedge with Gold and Bitcoin

 

Andrew Packer, Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

 

I’m thinking of starting a hedge fund. And I’d like to let you in on the ground floor.

No, seriously. No strings attached. In fact, you’ll be one of my clients. That’s not optional either. I may not be part of the government, but they’ve agreed to back me on this.

I’m talking about a true hedge fund, too. After all, the original idea of a hedge fund was to, well, hedge. To own positions that go against the traditional wisdom. Perhaps, even, to have capital on hand to take advantage of market opportunities.

In a way, a truly hedged fund would be balanced. Stable. And stability is a worthwhile goal, isn’t it? The opposite of stability is chaos. You’re not in favor of that, are you?

Now, hedge funds famously charge a “2 & 20” fee. That means they take 2% of your assets in the fund up front each year. Gotta pay the analysts and keep the lights on!

And 20% of the profits. It’s nice to get a bonus, isn’t it?

Sure, a truly hedged fund won’t make killer returns each year. So, the 2 & 20 fee is really a rip-off. But hedge funds that simply trade the market however they want, without really hedging, also fail to outperform the market over time.

So, instead of a 2 & 20 fee, I’ll charge an average of about 3.5% per year instead.

That sounds a lot fairer, doesn’t it? Of course, that’s just an average. Some years will be more. Some will be less. Ideally, I’d like to target a 2% annual fee. But things happen. It’s just the price of providing stability.

But don’t worry. While this fee is a bit more variable, but lower, I’ll make up for the losses on my end by ensuring that everyone has to pay it. Again, it’s not optional. Unless you live overseas… but even then, when markets get fearful, you’ll have no choice.

Even if you’re not directly using my fund, everyone should have to pay a small annual fee. After all, I’m looking to provide stability. Ultimately, that’s a small price to pay. Either way, I’m sure you won’t mind. You’re working, after all. The retired, newborn babies … they’re the ones who will be the worst impacted by this policy.

So, let’s talk returns. Frankly, the concept is overrated. Stability is what matters. With that end, most years I expect small gains. Don’t worry, I’ll take care of the taxes and make sure the U.S. Treasury gets their due.

But some years, I’ll have losses. My plan? Ignore them. I’ll just keep them on the balance sheet until they’re no longer losses. For assets like bonds, as long as I get paid, a short-term paper loss is no big deal. Even if it soars into the billions of dollars in losses or more.

In the end, with everyone in the country paying an average of 3% annually into my fund, losses really won’t matter.

Unfortunately, all the good names are taken. But Den of Vipers LLC looks like it’s still available. Shoutout to A. Jackson of Nashville, Tennessee for the idea.

Don’t Let this Hedge Fund Ruin Your Financial Future

Pretty genius idea, isn’t it? Thanks. I got it from an army of PhD experts on the economy.

You see, I’m just cribbing the idea from the ultimate “hedge” fund: The U.S. Federal Reserve.

The private bank (don’t let the .gov website or Senate approval for Fed Chairman fool you), is supposed to be the world’s lender of last resort. Thanks to that designation, it currently has losses of over $1.1 trillion on its balance sheet.

They’ve also had an exploding balance sheet every time there’s a crisis. And shrinking that balance sheet has been more theoretical than factual. A crisis tends to erupt when the bank moves too much towards shrinking its size by selling off assets.

As for that 3% fee… well, that’s just inflation, averaged over the past 50 years. It’s a bit higher than the Fed’s 2% target. But it hits everyone, working or retired, young or old.

That maybe why Andrew Jackson fought against a national bank, stating in 1834:

 “You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.”

If you wouldn’t take this offer as a prospective hedge fund investor, maybe you should look for assets outside of this system.

Gold meets that criteria, mostly. The Fed isn’t buying or selling the nation’s gold, although it is held on the bank’s books.

The U.S. government also holds bitcoin, seized through illegal activity. They’re gradually selling that stake off, but that could change next week if pro-bitcoin Donald Trump retakes office.

Both assets aren’t as subject to the whims of the Fed, which can wreak havoc on the economy by setting interest rates. By setting rates too high, they slow the economy into a recession. By setting rates too low, their usual policy, they help fuel bubbles in all sorts of assets.

This week, we’ve looked at gold, and to some extent bitcoin, for a variety of reasons.

The manipulations of the fiat system should be the first reason in your mind to own these assets outside of this system. And a key reason why gold and bitcoin prices can continue to rise in dollar terms.

 ~~ Andrew Packer, Grey Swan Investment Fraternity


Santiago Capital: Empire By Code

October 24, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

We believe the emergence of a USD stablecoin carries the potential to be a transformative event in monetary history, one as consequential as the day the United States severed its link to gold and as powerful in shaping the world’s financial order as the moment it abandoned Bretton Woods.

This paper does not offer reassurance of the status quo. It confronts a reality that few seem to have yet recognized and even fewer truly understand. It describes the quiet emergence of a tool whose strategic potential remains largely unseen, even as it begins to reshape the foundations of global finance.

Santiago Capital: Empire By Code
Who’s Debasing What?

October 24, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

After its blistering rally, gold shocked newcomers with a 6% two-day plunge this week, the steepest drop in twelve years. CNBC dubbed it “gold’s Halloween scare.”

In a welcome twist, J.P. Morgan called the decline “a much-needed breather,” predicting that prices will “reset for the next leg higher.” Goldman Sachs kept its $4,900 year-end target, saying “sticky, structural buying” from central banks remains intact.

“Gold isn’t falling,” Reuters happily agreed, “It’s catching its breath.”

Who’s Debasing What?
Leveraged to the Hilt

October 24, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Leverage is a two-way street. Investors get a tailwind on the way up. But small drops become a considerable problem – leading to “margin calls” when an investor is forced to settle the debt for a loss. 

Forced sales are a downside feature of stock market bubbles. The forced sale of stocks and hard assets like gold push prices lower even if the participants don’t want to sell.

Leveraged to the Hilt
Dismantling the Most Outrageous Lie in American Finance

October 23, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

When the government has to spend the bulk of its tax  revenue just to service the debt, it means there’s substantially less money for everything else, from military spending to border patrol.

Now, the White House hopes to be able to reduce its annual interest bill by slashing interest rates.

Think about it— even with a $38 trillion national debt, if the average interest rate is just 0.5%, the annual interest bill (at < $200 billion) is extremely manageable.

Dismantling the Most Outrageous Lie in American Finance