The Shale Gas Revolution Is Dead … Here’s What To Do Now

It’s difficult to look beyond bitcoin and MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) at the moment, the later in particular. Nobody expected this, not even Chairman Michael Saylor. The returns have been astonishing. A couple of readers have reported to me that the gains have been life-changing. Wow! What an email to receive.

It’s easy to get hubristic when you have a big win. Instead, let us express gratitude for the good fortune that has smiled upon us.

But look beyond we must, and so today I want to look at what I can only describe as a stealth bull market – natural gas. The price is creeping up, and few are talking about it.

Natural gas is a bit like silver: if it can disappoint, it will. So we begin this piece with that reminder. Natural gas has broken the soul of many a wiser man than me.

On the other hand, the next five years look pretty positive.

It’s obvious that the world is going to go nuclear now, and that Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are going to provide the power AI so badly needs. However, it will be a good five years before they on stream, so what is going to provide the power in the interim?

The answer is natural gas.

There is a problem, however: Supply.

America’s Gas Wells Are Drying Up

The North American Shale Gas Revolution dramatically changed the outlook for fossil fuels. Peak Oil was a huge theme leading up to the Global Financial Crisis, and then it disappeared, almost overnight.

Between 2005 and 2020, US natural gas production grew by 90%, with shale accounting for the bulk of it. In 2005, shale gas made up about 5% of US natural gas production; by 2020, it was over 75%. By 2017, the US had become a net exporter, especially of more transportable liquefied natural gas (LNG).

The price, meanwhile, plummeted. Good for consumers!

Here’s the long-term chart so you can see those price declines since 2005. From almost $16 to $3.50 today (as low as $1.50 earlier this year, where it has formed an attractive double bottom – you know how I like those).

Obviously, we in the UK and Europe pay way more for our natural gas than they do in North America. It’s so dumb; we have enough to supply ourselves in the UK. But we don’t because fracking is deemed environmentally damaging. So we import gas from abroad, which is produced by, you guessed it, fracking. I guess if it is fracked somewhere else, it’s less harmful. Not

Then there are the transport costs and the environmental costs that come with that.

Anyway …

Spanning Ohio, New York, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania, Marcellus is the largest natural gas-producing field in the United States, contributing over 25% of production. In 2010, output was 2 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d). By 2023, it exceeded 35 bcf/d, but production has been falling for almost a year now. We are currently at 26.7 bcf/d

The next largest is Haynesville, in Louisiana, Texas, and parts of Arkansas. Extraction costs here are higher, and production stands at 16 bcf/d, but it is slowing here too, according to analysts Goehring & Rozencwajg.

One of the few areas of growth is the Permian Basin, in Texas and New Mexico, currently around 23 bcf/d, but even there, growth is modest.

Now, it might be that the reason for stagnating growth is low prices – they often are – and higher prices will result in increased production. They usually do. That is the way with commodities.

But natural gas prices have already doubled this year, and they keep on creeping up.

The other interpretation is that the North American Shale Gas Revolution has passed its peak.

With America’s new president, you can expect plenty more investment in production than under the Democrats, and that should bring the price down, but the gas price has actually risen – from $2.70 to $3.50 – since the election.

It might also be that Russian gas taps come back online to the EU sometime next year, which means America will lose its new market.

But all of this conjecture is factored into the price. And that is rising.

Dominic Frisby ~~ The Flying Frisby

It’s easy to get hubristic when you have a big win. Instead, let us express gratitude for the good fortune that has smiled upon us.

But look beyond we must, and so today I want to look at what I can only describe as a stealth bull market – natural gas. The price is creeping up, and few are talking about it.

Natural gas is a bit like silver: if it can disappoint, it will. So we begin this piece with that reminder. Natural gas has broken the soul of many a wiser man than me.

On the other hand, the next five years look pretty positive.

The answer is natural gas.

There is a problem, however: Supply.

America’s Gas Wells Are Drying Up

The price, meanwhile, plummeted. Good for consumers!

Then there are the transport costs and the environmental costs that come with that.

Anyway …

One of the few areas of growth is the Permian Basin, in Texas and New Mexico, currently around 23 bcf/d, but even there, growth is modest.

Now, it might be that the reason for stagnating growth is low prices – they often are – and higher prices will result in increased production. They usually do. That is the way with commodities.

But natural gas prices have already doubled this year, and they keep on creeping up.

The other interpretation is that the North American Shale Gas Revolution has passed its peak.

It might also be that Russian gas taps come back online to the EU sometime next year, which means America will lose its new market.

But all of this conjecture is factored into the price. And that is rising.

Dominic Frisby ~~ The Flying Frisby

Having said all that, why does President Trump want Greenland so badly (other than as retribution for not being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize)?

He insists it’s for national security, but, as I mentioned earlier, the U.S. military already has broad access to the island, as spelled out in the 1951 agreement signed by the U.S. and Denmark. Further, Greenland is under the protection of NATO, of which the U.S. is a member. If Russia or China tried to attack it, Article 5 of the treaty would be triggered, activating NATO forces.

Recent reporting suggests that some of Trump’s wealthiest backers see Greenland not as a military outpost or mining play, but as a blank slate. According to Reuters, influential tech investors—including Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen—have pitched the idea of turning parts of Greenland into a so-called “freedom city,” offering a low-regulation, quasi-autonomous hub for next-gen technologies.

Japan’s 40-year yield climbed to a record 4.21%.

Japan holds $1.2 trillion in U.S. Treasurys.

When their domestic yields spike, Japanese capital returns home. That means selling U.S. assets: stocks, bonds, ETFs. That selling pressure cascaded through the global financial system.

This mechanism isn’t new.

Social spending in Europe has roughly doubled in the past 30 years. But only in 2025 has defense spending returned to levels last seen when the Berlin Wall was still standing.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimated on NBC’s Meet the Press over the weekend that the US has spent 22 trillion dollars on its commitment to NATO. Or, roughly two-thirds of the U.S.’s $38 trillion in national debt.
Social spending in Europe has roughly doubled in the past 30 years. But only in 2025 has defense spending returned to levels last seen when the Berlin Wall was still standing.

Trump boarded Air Force One this morning for the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. It’s been one year to the day since his second inauguration. At this year’s summit — already set to break attendance records with 65 heads of state and over 850 global CEOs — Greenland is top of the agenda.

“We’re going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not,” Trump told reporters earlier this month.