GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

The “ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL” Tax Bill is the Opposite of What America Needs

Loading ...James Hickman

May 15, 2025 • 5 minute, 57 second read


Empire of DebtspendingTaxes

The “ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL” Tax Bill is the Opposite of What America Needs

“The income tax created more criminals than any other single act of government.”

–Barry Goldwater

May 15, 2025 — In the year 428 BC, ancient Athenians imposed a special tax called the eisphora that targeted local business investments in the city-state.

It was expensive and highly unpopular among investors. And wealthy Athenians simply stopped investing in local businesses to avoid the tax.

This is almost an iron-clad lesson of history: whenever governments tax something, they end up with less of it. And the inverse is also true: whenever governments subsidize or cut taxes on something, they end up with more of it.

In 221 BC, the Qin government of ancient China imposed a tax on salt consumption. So, people consumed less of it… which led to significant health issues given that salt was used to cure meat and prevent bacteria growth.

In 202 AD, Roman Emperor Septimus Severus imposed taxes on olive oil production to help fund welfare for the city’s poor. Farmers cut back on production to avoid the tax, and olive oil supply dropped dramatically.

In the year 1302, the Republic of Florence imposed a steep tax on new businesses and guild membership. Business registrations dropped by 20% over the next decade, and the Florentine economy suffered significantly.

Around the same time, cities in Germany’s Hanseatic League (like Lubeck and Hamburg) offered tax exemptions to businesses and merchants. And as a result, the number of registered businesses (especially in Lubeck) rose by 30%.

And finally, in 17th century Holland, the government offered tax breaks and subsidies to the sugar industry… resulting in, you guessed it, an explosion in per-capita sugar consumption and the invention of sugar-laden desserts.

All of these examples make perfect sense; most of us have first-hand experience in taxes influencing our own consumer, business, and investment choices. And that’s why I’ve long argued that tax policy is a reflection of a nation’s values and priorities.

I bring this up because the House Ways and Means Committee released its 389-page “big, beautiful” tax bill yesterday. It’s literally called “THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL” in all caps.

I read it last night… and I’m really scratching my head at how this bill reflects America’s current values and priorities.

For example, families (with adjusted gross income of $200,000 or less) will be able to deduct up to $10,000 per year in interest on car loans.

Given that the average auto loan rate is 4.77% for borrowers with top credit, this means that a buyer could theoretically purchase a 1,064 horsepower Corvette ZR1 for ~$210,000 with a loan from General Motors and write off all the interest.

Yes, the vehicle must at least be ‘assembled’ in America, so there’s some support to the US auto industry.

But clearly a tax break on auto loan interest will encourage more people to go into debt to buy a rapidly depreciating vehicle. And as much as I love Corvettes, I’m not sure this should be a national priority.

An even bigger provision is the “No Tax On Tips” section.

This was a big campaign promise to win votes from service workers in the swing state of Nevada. But in such a tip-crazy country as the US, where seemingly everyone expects a gratuity these days (including the self-service machines at the airport where no human being is even involved!), it’s a bizarre priority.

Who even understands tipping culture anyhow? A pizza delivery guy almost always receives a tip. But a school bus driver (who must responsibly and safely transport dozens of children) does not.

People will give ten bucks to a valet parking attendant who drives your car 50 feet. Yet, for all the times I ever heard “thank you for your service” when I was in the military, I never once received (nor obviously expected) a gratuity.

Clearly Americans don’t value pizza over the lives of children, nor valet parking over national defense. But somewhere along the way, tipping culture in America got out of control. This legislation will make it worse… because now there will be an even greater expectation for tips.

More importantly, what does this tax provision say about national priorities?

They didn’t pass any tax incentives for careers that can substantially boost US economic growth, like AI developers or nuclear power engineers. Or even critical blue-collar jobs where the country is woefully short– like truck drivers and oil roughnecks.

Instead, these politicians seemingly got together and said, “We want more blackjack dealers, let’s create tax incentives for that industry.”

This will almost certainly have unintended consequences.

Among them: many of today’s lecherous professions (like online “content creators” and webcam models) technically earn tips. So young people could end up with perverse financial incentives to take their clothes off for a living rather than do something productive.

I’m not sure how this is going to Make America Great Again; frankly the whole “ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL” is rather underwhelming and provides very little incentive for economic growth.

Rather, it prioritizes more debt and more consumption… which is the opposite of what American needs right now.

To your freedom,

James Hickman
Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign LLC

P.S. from Andrew: We continue to enjoy our ongoing conversations with our members, whether through Grey Swan Live, or with our reader feedback on our daily emails – keep it comin’!

Paul thoughtfully writes in:

I dropped the “protection” portfolio and put most of my portfolio in Tech. I’m up 50% on my total portfolio since April 7th. I don’t want to lose that gain if it’s looking like the USD will be a thing of history. Are there any indicators we should be watching to give us an early warning to a USD collapse/switch out? Do you think he would put us back on gold, silver, crypto or a combination?

I don’t know how to follow the Bond Market?

Your insights are greatly appreciated.

First, Paul, thanks for writing in – and congratulations on your gains!

We still see value in gold and silver, even though it makes us sound like a broken record. And we see bitcoin holding its own as well. As we’ve written before, these assets are worth adding to when you have extra capital. And all three may see some short-term swings if the dollar collapses dramatically, but these assets should hold their own over time.

Regarding the bond market, we largely look at current rates, the trend in rates, and the performance of the yield curve. Remember, the bond market is where cautious investors park their money – and its value is larger than the stock market.

We follow that up with by watching Treasury bond market auctions, which occur weekly. Sometimes they don’t have a lot of interest, which can create some jitters in the market. Just knowing those big trends can tell you a lot about what the cautious money thinks now.

In the Grey Swan model portfolio, we have two bond ETFs, designed to take advantage of today’s relatively high interest rates, and with the potential to see outsized gains depending on changes in interest rates.

Your thoughts? Please send them here: addison@greyswanfraternity.com


The Money Printer Is Coming Back—And Trump Is Taking Over the Fed

December 9, 2025 • Lau Vegys

Trump and Powell are no buddies. They’ve been fighting over rate cuts all year—Trump demanding more, Powell holding back. Even after cutting twice, Trump called him “grossly incompetent” and said he’d “love to fire” him. The tension has been building for months.

And Trump now seems ready to install someone who shares his appetite for lower rates and easier money.

Trump has been dropping hints for weeks—saying on November 18, “I think I already know my choice,” and then doubling down last Sunday aboard Air Force One with, “I know who I am going to pick… we’ll be announcing it.”

He was referring to one Kevin Hassett, who—according to a recent Bloomberg report—has emerged as the overwhelming favorite to become the next Fed chair.

The Money Printer Is Coming Back—And Trump Is Taking Over the Fed
Waiting for Jerome

December 9, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Here we sit — investors, analysts, retirees, accountants, even a few masochistic economists — gathered beneath the leafless monetary tree, rehearsing our lines as we wait for Jerome Powell to step onstage and tell us what the future means.

Spoiler: he can’t. But that does not stop us from waiting.

Tomorrow, he is expected to deliver the December rate cut. Polymarket odds sit at 96% for a dainty 25-point cut.

Trump, Navarro and Lutnick pine for 50 points.

And somewhere in the wings smiles Kevin Hassett — at 74% odds this morning,  the presumed Powell successor — watching the last few snowflakes fall before his cue arrives.

Waiting for Jerome
Deep Value Going Global in 2026

December 9, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

With U.S. stocks trading at about 24 times forward earnings, plans for capital growth have to go off without a hitch. Given the billions of dollars in commitments by AI companies, financing to the hilt on debt, the most realistic outcome is a hitch.

On a valuation basis, global markets will likely show better returns than U.S. stocks in 2026.

America leads the world in innovation. A U.S. tech stock will naturally fetch a higher price than, say, a German brewery. But value matters, too.

Deep Value Going Global in 2026
Pablo Hill: An Unmistakable Pattern in Copper

December 8, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

As copper flowed into the United States, LME inventories thinned and backwardation steepened. Higher U.S. pricing, tariff protection, and lower political risk made American warehouses the most attractive destination for metal. Each new shipment strengthened the spread.

The arbitrage, once triggered, became self-reinforcing. Traders were not participating in theory; they were responding to the physical incentives in front of them.

The United States had quietly become the marginal buyer of the world’s most important industrial metal. China, long the gravitational center of global copper demand, found itself on the outside.

Pablo Hill: An Unmistakable Pattern in Copper