Ripple Effect

The Mainstream Media Reverses Course on a Recession

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

May 13, 20251 minute, 17 second read


The Mainstream Media Reverses Course on a Recession

Several banks called for a recession in 2025 as recently as last week, following a surprise negative read in GDP.

But with a China trade deal in place, many of those big Wall Street banks are reversing course. This morning, JPMorgan noted that it did not see a recession anymore.

That’s also reflected in the betting markets. Polymarket showed as much as a 66% chance of a recession in 2025 – as recently as the start of the month.

Today, the odds are now down to around 40% – and should fall further as more trade deals are announced.

Turn Your Images On

As Andrew notes:

Most mainstream analysts will take a current trend and extrapolate its continuation out forever. That’s lazy, first-level thinking. A better approach is to think in terms of probabilities and what can change them. Tariff and trade news can – and now has – changed on a dime.

We’re still skeptical about this current market rally, even as many factors have turned bullish.

Why? One reason is simple – we won’t rule out a recession as government spending shrinks.

Given that the government spends more than it brings in, about 6% of GDP, a government recession wouldn’t be a bad idea — just a painful, but necessary correction.

That’s the line of thinking behind some of our upcoming research, where we look at President Trump’s three-step plan to reform the economy on sturdier ground. If it comes to pass, it could be an incredibly positive Grey Swan event. We’ll have further details on that research later this month.

-Addison


DASH and LOW Stock Have One Key Thing In Common

September 18, 2025Adam O'Dell

Sometimes, a compelling market trend flashes like a neon sign on the Vegas strip.

We’ve seen that a lot with mega trends like artificial intelligence (AI) over the last few years. Just last week, Oracle was rewarded with a 40% post-earnings pop in its stock price after a strong earnings outlook for its AI cloud business.

Other times, you’ve got to do a little work to find out what’s driving a stock’s price higher. And my “New Bulls” list each week is a great place to start.

DASH and LOW Stock Have One Key Thing In Common
The Carrot and The Stick

September 18, 2025Addison Wiggin

Incentives grow markets. Regulation stunts their fragile bones.

The Fed’s rate cuts are carrots. Markets are feasting on them. Over in the Grey Swan Trading Fraternity, Portfolio Director Andrew Packer added a long trade in the commodity market – in a small-cap player, producing a commodity domestically.

As a cherry on top, it might be the next MP Materials or Intel and get explicit government backing, which could really cause shares to take off.

Trump’s threats to the Fed, or the FCC’s jawboning of broadcasters, are sticks. Investors must decide which matters more.

As one market veteran told The Wall Street Journal: “Cheaper money is a carrot. But the bigger question is whether trust in our institutions can hold. Without that, the carrots won’t matter.”

The Carrot and The Stick
Nasdaq Enters Nosebleed Heights

September 18, 2025Addison Wiggin

If you follow technical indicators, the Nasdaq — a broad measure of tech stocks — is now “extremely overbought”… a level only seen in 0.4% of its history.

That’s less than half a percent, and it is likely the precursor to a correction when traders decide to take profits.

Our advice, “panic now, avoid the rush” and rotate your tech into hard assets such as gold , bitcoin, and commodities in general.

Nasdaq Enters Nosebleed Heights
Stefan Bartl: From Draining the Swamp to Owning Intel: Is the Right Becoming What It Feared?

September 17, 2025Addison Wiggin

As time unfolds, the US federal government’s tentacles burrow ever-deeper into the economy. In the 2008 crisis, banks deemed “too big to fail” received a government bailout. The following year, automobile firms GM and Chrysler were saved from bankruptcy. When the Treasury exited GM in 2013, taxpayers were left with a loss of more than $10 billion. Ten years later, the federal government forbade Nippon Steel to acquire US Steel, in a merger they both desired. Instead, the government settled for Nippon Steel to invest in US Steel alongside its own direct ownership of the firm via a “golden share.” Just this past week, the US federal government announced its 10 percent stake in Intel, the struggling US semiconductor giant. On top of the $7 billion Intel had already received from the 2024 CHIPS Act, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo called Intel “America’s champion semiconductor company.”

Stefan Bartl: From Draining the Swamp to Owning Intel: Is the Right Becoming What It Feared?