The Inflation Reduction Act’s Uncertain Future

James West, The Midas Letter

Trump’s stance on renewable energy and climate change is clear: Climate change is a hoax and any barriers to growth at any cost of the US oil and gas industry will be eliminated.

But one has to wonder, with the recent nuptials of bros Trump and Musk now consecrated in victory, how does that jive with the electric car business of the First Laddie?

One might assume that, among the victims of Trump’s newly sharpened axe, would be the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 – Joe Biden’s signature accomplishment in the clean energy sector.

Within the Act are numerous projects that are funded by the Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Program, which has $5 billion earmarked for clean energy projects that re-vitalize existing energy facilities that have passed out of service, with a total zero percent loan guarantee program of $250 billion available.

Matthew Daly, in a comment to PBS stated, “Basically everything that President Biden has tried to do, President Trump is going to try to undo. And you mentioned the Inflation Reduction Act, which is a terribly named law, but it’s a very wide reaching law that basically tries to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to promote clean energy and has a lot of tax credits in there.”

Never a nation to dilly dally when the federal government is handing out free money, numerous projects have already been approved and are underway. Most of these are in Republican jurisdictions, so there will be significant internal resistance should Trump wish to unilaterally cancel the Act.

Trump is more likely to dismantle pieces of the Act that benefit Democratic sponsored projects while leaving the Republican beneficiaries unscathed. You might think there is no way to do that legislatively, but Trump has demonstrated a persistent ability to rewrite the rulebook when it comes to targeting his enemies.

The Economic Case for Preservation

The IRA has spurred significant investment and job growth in the clean energy sector, with over $500 billion in planned investments and a growth rate twice that of the overall US employment market ¹. Repealing the law would undermine private investments and halt ongoing development, ultimately costing taxpayers billions of dollars.

Harry Godfrey, head of Advanced Energy United’s federal investment and manufacturing working group, notes that the IRA’s tax incentives align with Trump’s goals of energy independence and onshoring manufacturing.

Arguments Against Repeal

Bipartisan Support: 18 House Republicans have expressed opposition to repealing the IRA’s clean energy and manufacturing tax credits, citing the law’s benefits in their districts ¹.
Economic Interests: The IRA has driven economic growth in states with significant Republican representation, making a full repeal politically challenging
Global Competition: The US needs to maintain its competitive edge in the clean energy sector to counter China’s dominance

Arguments For Repeal

Trump’s Campaign Promises: Trump has pledged to repeal the IRA and halt offshore wind development ;
Ideological Opposition: Some Republicans may seek to dismantle the law due to ideological differences ;
Alternative Priorities: The GOP may redirect funds allocated to clean energy toward other priorities, such as tax cuts ¹.

The Way Forward

While the IRA faces uncertainty, experts like Gina McCarthy, former national climate advisor, remain optimistic: “The shift to clean energy is unstoppable… Our coalition is bigger, more bipartisan, better organized, and fully prepared to deliver climate solutions”.

So its pretty clear that, despite Trump’s idealogical opposition to anything to do with clean energy, he may find more immediate gratification for his revenge porn fantasies tea-bagging on the foreheads of less popular policies. We will have to wait and see what happens on January 6th….if he even makes it to that date.

James West, The Midas Letter

Trump’s stance on renewable energy and climate change is clear: Climate change is a hoax and any barriers to growth at any cost of the US oil and gas industry will be eliminated.

But one has to wonder, with the recent nuptials of bros Trump and Musk now consecrated in victory, how does that jive with the electric car business of the First Laddie?

One might assume that, among the victims of Trump’s newly sharpened axe, would be the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 – Joe Biden’s signature accomplishment in the clean energy sector.

The Economic Case for Preservation

Arguments Against Repeal

Bipartisan Support: 18 House Republicans have expressed opposition to repealing the IRA’s clean energy and manufacturing tax credits, citing the law’s benefits in their districts ¹.
Economic Interests: The IRA has driven economic growth in states with significant Republican representation, making a full repeal politically challenging
Global Competition: The US needs to maintain its competitive edge in the clean energy sector to counter China’s dominance

Arguments For Repeal

Trump’s Campaign Promises: Trump has pledged to repeal the IRA and halt offshore wind development ;
Ideological Opposition: Some Republicans may seek to dismantle the law due to ideological differences ;
Alternative Priorities: The GOP may redirect funds allocated to clean energy toward other priorities, such as tax cuts ¹.

The Way Forward

For now, the mixed economic data means stocks will likely trend higher, until there’s a crisis. And when there is a crisis, the Fed will finally make its move and aggressively cut rates.

And, for now, bond yields are still near their highest level in 15 years. Bond yields, even on U.S. Treasury bonds, are over the rate of inflation.

In short, it’s not a bad time to lock in bond yields now – which will go lower during a crisis, pushing bond prices higher. And in a crisis, today’s high-flying stocks, driven by retail investors with a fear of missing out – could easily get crushed.

Markets are humming, policy dazzles, but beneath the gloss — tech booms, liquidity surges, digital currencies — the very foundations of money, governance, and investor sentiment are cracking, realigning, even smoldering.

The post-World War II Pax Americana isn’t evolving; it’s being dismantled rather quickly.

What’s emerging is accompanied by a load of distraction and showmanship. So it’s important to focus on the actual events taking place right now that are going to affect your portfolio this year.

And, we can’t overstate this, the changes that are actually happening right now to your money.

Today, digital dollars masquerade as cash, tariffs are cloaked as protection, AI layoffs spun as productivity, private assets packaged as democratized. And yet, none of it matters if the final pillar — confidence — crumbles.

When belief falters, no trumpet of “seismic event” grants you shelter.

Private equity tends to perform better than the stock market, provided you do so over time.

Private credit, a newer asset class but a rapidly growing one, also shows strong returns, as well as relatively high current income.

And if you have a retirement account, chances are you’re willing to think long-term.

Win-win, right? Not necessarily.

First, these new funds would also come with an incentive structure similar to investing in a hedge fund. That includes a higher fee than a market index ETF – think 2% compared to 0.1% (or less).

Plus, many of these funds have a hurdle rate attached to them as well. Once they clear 5% returns – which, with private credit, can be easily cleared by making deals with cash returns over 5% – additional incentive fees may kick in.

Several factors are likely at play here. Rising uncertainty over Trump’s tariff and trade policies – even though he’s largely walked those back.

A bigger factor? The rise of AI.

Many big tech companies have been making layoffs this year, citing increased productivity as a reason. For instance, Microsoft just announced another 9,000 in layoffs.

Of course, when an individual company announces layoffs, it’s usually bullish for shares. That company is doing the same – or more – with a smaller headcount. That’s lower costs and higher productivity.

But in a world where every company can lay off a sizable percentage of their staff, we have more unemployed consumers, who tend to cut back on spending.