The Inflation Reduction Act’s Uncertain Future

James West, The Midas Letter

Trump’s stance on renewable energy and climate change is clear: Climate change is a hoax and any barriers to growth at any cost of the US oil and gas industry will be eliminated.

But one has to wonder, with the recent nuptials of bros Trump and Musk now consecrated in victory, how does that jive with the electric car business of the First Laddie?

One might assume that, among the victims of Trump’s newly sharpened axe, would be the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 – Joe Biden’s signature accomplishment in the clean energy sector.

Within the Act are numerous projects that are funded by the Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Program, which has $5 billion earmarked for clean energy projects that re-vitalize existing energy facilities that have passed out of service, with a total zero percent loan guarantee program of $250 billion available.

Matthew Daly, in a comment to PBS stated, “Basically everything that President Biden has tried to do, President Trump is going to try to undo. And you mentioned the Inflation Reduction Act, which is a terribly named law, but it’s a very wide reaching law that basically tries to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to promote clean energy and has a lot of tax credits in there.”

Never a nation to dilly dally when the federal government is handing out free money, numerous projects have already been approved and are underway. Most of these are in Republican jurisdictions, so there will be significant internal resistance should Trump wish to unilaterally cancel the Act.

Trump is more likely to dismantle pieces of the Act that benefit Democratic sponsored projects while leaving the Republican beneficiaries unscathed. You might think there is no way to do that legislatively, but Trump has demonstrated a persistent ability to rewrite the rulebook when it comes to targeting his enemies.

The Economic Case for Preservation

The IRA has spurred significant investment and job growth in the clean energy sector, with over $500 billion in planned investments and a growth rate twice that of the overall US employment market ¹. Repealing the law would undermine private investments and halt ongoing development, ultimately costing taxpayers billions of dollars.

Harry Godfrey, head of Advanced Energy United’s federal investment and manufacturing working group, notes that the IRA’s tax incentives align with Trump’s goals of energy independence and onshoring manufacturing.

Arguments Against Repeal

Bipartisan Support: 18 House Republicans have expressed opposition to repealing the IRA’s clean energy and manufacturing tax credits, citing the law’s benefits in their districts ¹.
Economic Interests: The IRA has driven economic growth in states with significant Republican representation, making a full repeal politically challenging
Global Competition: The US needs to maintain its competitive edge in the clean energy sector to counter China’s dominance

Arguments For Repeal

Trump’s Campaign Promises: Trump has pledged to repeal the IRA and halt offshore wind development ;
Ideological Opposition: Some Republicans may seek to dismantle the law due to ideological differences ;
Alternative Priorities: The GOP may redirect funds allocated to clean energy toward other priorities, such as tax cuts ¹.

The Way Forward

While the IRA faces uncertainty, experts like Gina McCarthy, former national climate advisor, remain optimistic: “The shift to clean energy is unstoppable… Our coalition is bigger, more bipartisan, better organized, and fully prepared to deliver climate solutions”.

So its pretty clear that, despite Trump’s idealogical opposition to anything to do with clean energy, he may find more immediate gratification for his revenge porn fantasies tea-bagging on the foreheads of less popular policies. We will have to wait and see what happens on January 6th….if he even makes it to that date.

James West, The Midas Letter

Trump’s stance on renewable energy and climate change is clear: Climate change is a hoax and any barriers to growth at any cost of the US oil and gas industry will be eliminated.

But one has to wonder, with the recent nuptials of bros Trump and Musk now consecrated in victory, how does that jive with the electric car business of the First Laddie?

One might assume that, among the victims of Trump’s newly sharpened axe, would be the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 – Joe Biden’s signature accomplishment in the clean energy sector.

The Economic Case for Preservation

Arguments Against Repeal

Bipartisan Support: 18 House Republicans have expressed opposition to repealing the IRA’s clean energy and manufacturing tax credits, citing the law’s benefits in their districts ¹.
Economic Interests: The IRA has driven economic growth in states with significant Republican representation, making a full repeal politically challenging
Global Competition: The US needs to maintain its competitive edge in the clean energy sector to counter China’s dominance

Arguments For Repeal

Trump’s Campaign Promises: Trump has pledged to repeal the IRA and halt offshore wind development ;
Ideological Opposition: Some Republicans may seek to dismantle the law due to ideological differences ;
Alternative Priorities: The GOP may redirect funds allocated to clean energy toward other priorities, such as tax cuts ¹.

The Way Forward

Relative to GDP, the net international investment claim on the U.S. economy was 20% in 2003. It had swollen to 65% by 2023. Practically every type of American company, bond, or real estate asset now has some degree of foreign ownership.

But it’s even worse than that. As the federal deficit has pumped up the GDP figures, and made a larger share of the economy dependent on government spending, the quality and sustainability of GDP have deteriorated. So, foreigners, to the extent they are paying attention, are accumulating claims on an economy that has been eroded by inefficient, government-directed spending and “investments.” Why should foreign creditors maintain confidence in the integrity of these paper claims? Only to the extent that their economies are even worse off. And in the case of China, that’s probably true.

As global government interest expense climbed, gold quietly followed it higher. The IIF estimates that interest costs on government debt now run at nearly $4.9 trillion annually. Over the same span, gold prices have tracked that burden almost one-for-one.

Silver has recently gone along for the ride, with even more enthusiasm.

Since early 2023, Japan’s 10-year government bond yield has risen roughly 150 basis points, touching levels not seen since the 1990s.

Over that same period, gold prices have surged about 135%, while silver is up roughly 175%. Zoom out two years, and the divergence becomes starker still: gold up 114%, silver up 178%, while the S&P 500 gained 44%.

According to the American Association of Individual Investors, the average retail investor has about a 70% allocation to stocks. That’s well over the traditional 60/40 split between stocks and bonds. Even a 60/40 allocation ignores real estate, gold, collectibles, and private assets.

A pullback in the 10% range – which is likely in any given year – will prompt investors to scream as if it’s the end of the world.

Our “panic now, avoid the rush” strategy is simple.

Take tech profits off the table, raise some cash, and focus on industry-leading companies that pay dividends. Roll those dividends up and use compounding to your overall portfolio’s advantage.

In a healthy economy, production and consumption communicate constantly. If a company builds something useful, customers respond by buying it. If they overbuild, inventories pile up and prices fall, sending a signal to slow down.

AI infrastructure, by contrast, is being built largely on faith. Companies are scaling up compute power without clear signs of sustainable demand. Unlike oil and gas, where prices adjust second-by-second, AI companies operate in a fog. They release tools, collect usage stats, and hope that paid conversions will follow.