Tariff Revenues = Rounding Error

The July numbers are in. Unlike the BLS data — which can get “seasonally adjusted” into something unrecognizable months later — the Congressional Budget Office’s tallies are final. What they report es lo que es. It is what it is.

In near real-time, we can see exactly how much Uncle Sam is hauling in from taxes and tariffs… and how much is pouring back out for the military, social programs, and, of course, the ever-growing interest on the national debt.

Even as President Trump touts record tariff revenues, the red ink flows on.

Turn Your Images On

Government continues to spend far in excess of what it brings in, even as tariffs rise. (Source: CBO)

July alone saw a $291 billion deficit — in one month. At this pace, annual deficits could easily run closer to $3 trillion. That money will either be printed or borrowed at rates north of 4%.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) hasn’t made much of a dent in spending, nor have sky-high tariff rates. Which leaves us with a stubborn reality: the deficit remains the single biggest long-term threat to the American success story.

~ Addison

P.S. Some companies are thriving under the shifting tariff regime — and from other Trump policies that are decidedly pro-growth. But “pro-growth” also means you need lower interest rates. At least in the Trump Great Reset playbook.

The tricky part? Government printing debt out of thin air usually means more inflation. Under normal circumstances, the Federal Reserve would be leaving rates unchanged in September… or even raising them.

Therein lies the pickle we’re in.

You can’t let interest payments on the existing debt swallow the government budget. This means that, in addition to “pro-growth” economic strategies, you need lower interest rates.

But lower interest rates also mean higher consumer prices for necessities like energy, food, housing, health care and tuition.

The bond market doesn’t like deficits or debt, either. Investors demand higher interest rates to lend the government money.

Like we said, it’s a pickle.

We’ll be digging into both sides of that equation — plus our latest research — in this week’s Grey Swan Live! on Friday, August 15, 2025… exactly 54 years since Nixon “closed the gold window.” Members will get the sneak peek before anyone else.

A special note to Grey Swan subscribers: This week’s Grey Swan Live! will be held on Friday at 11 a.m., not tomorrow. We’re in the middle of some new groundbreaking research – and will have even more details that afternoon. But our paid-up Fraternity members will get an early sneak peek at what we see developing.

Sneak Peek Grey Swan Live!
Friday, August 15, 2025
11am ET

We set up a “VIP access” hot list for non-paying members of the Grey Swan Investment Fraternity. To be reminded before Friday’s event, click on this link and add your name and e-mail to the list.

As always, your reader feedback is welcome: feedback@greyswanfraternity.com (We read all emails. Thanks in advance for your contribution.)

Even as President Trump touts record tariff revenues, the red ink flows on.

Turn Your Images On

Government continues to spend far in excess of what it brings in, even as tariffs rise. (Source: CBO)

July alone saw a $291 billion deficit — in one month. At this pace, annual deficits could easily run closer to $3 trillion. That money will either be printed or borrowed at rates north of 4%.

~ Addison

Therein lies the pickle we’re in.

You can’t let interest payments on the existing debt swallow the government budget. This means that, in addition to “pro-growth” economic strategies, you need lower interest rates.

But lower interest rates also mean higher consumer prices for necessities like energy, food, housing, health care and tuition.

The bond market doesn’t like deficits or debt, either. Investors demand higher interest rates to lend the government money.

Like we said, it’s a pickle.

Sneak Peek Grey Swan Live!
Friday, August 15, 2025
11am ET

As always, your reader feedback is welcome: feedback@greyswanfraternity.com (We read all emails. Thanks in advance for your contribution.)

By then the receipts on my desk had arranged themselves into a sort of chorus. I heard, faintly, another refrain—one from Kentucky. In the first days of the shutdown, Senator Rand Paul stood alone among Republicans and voted against his party’s stopgap, telling interviewers that the numbers “don’t add up” and that he would not sign on to another year that piles $2 trillion onto the debt.

That, I realized, is what the tariff story shares with the broader budget theater: the habit of calling a tax something else, of shifting burdens into the fog and then celebrating the silhouette as victory. Even the vote tally made the point: he was the only Republican “no,” a lonely arithmetic lesson in a crowded room.

Senator Rand Paul, (R. KY), who was the sole Republican to vote against a continuing resolution, seems to care about the actual finances of the government. “I would never vote for a bill that added $2 trillion in national debt,” Paul said in various interviews over the weekend.

The $2 trillion he’s referring to is the lesser of two proposals made by the national parties… and would accrue during this next fiscal year.

Oy.

We liked what Liz Wolfe at Reason wrote on Friday, so we’ll repeat it here: “One of the dirty little secrets of every shutdown is that everything remains mostly fine. Private markets could easily replace many federal functions.”

It’s a strange kind of confidence — one where Wall Street soars while Washington goes dark.

The Liberal Democratic Party victory has sent Japanese stocks soaring, as party President Sanae Takaichi – now set to become Japan’s first female Prime Minister – is a proponent of stimulus spending, and a China hawk. The electoral win is a vote to keep the yen carry trade alive… and well.

The “yen carry trade” is a currency trading strategy. By borrowing Japanese yen at low interest rates and investing in higher-yielding assets, investors have profited from the interest rate differential. Yen carry trades have played a huge role in global liquidity for decades.

Frankly, we’re disappointed — not because of the carry trade but because the crowd got this one so wrong!

Back in the Global Financial Crisis (2008), we recall mass layoffs were driving desperation.

Today, unemployment is relatively low, if climbing.

Affordability is much more of an issue. Food, rent, healthcare, and childcare are all rising faster than wages. Households aren’t jobless; they’re stretched. Job “quits” are at crisis-level lows.

In addition to the top 10% of earners, consumer spending is still strong. Not necessarily because of prosperity, but because households are taking extra shifts, hustling gigs, working late into the night, and using credit cards. The trends hold up demand but hollow out savings.

It’s the quiet form of financial repression. In an era of fiscal dominance, savers see easy returns clipped, workers stretch hours just to stay even, and wealth slips upward into assets while daily life grows harder to afford.

The $2 trillion he’s referring to is the lesser of two proposals made by the national parties… and would accrue during this next fiscal year.

Oy.

It’s a strange kind of confidence — one where Wall Street soars while Washington goes dark.

Frankly, we’re disappointed — not because of the carry trade but because the crowd got this one so wrong!

Back in the Global Financial Crisis (2008), we recall mass layoffs were driving desperation.

Today, unemployment is relatively low, if climbing.