GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

Moody’s States the Obvious

Loading ...James Hickman

May 20, 2025 • 6 minute, 59 second read


debtdollarspending

Moody’s States the Obvious

“People hate to think about bad things happening, so they always underestimate their likelihood.”

–The Big Short

May 20, 2025 — In the year 1980, a young computer science grad student from the University of Washington named Burrell “Bud” Tribble accepted a job at a hot tech startup you might have heard of: it’s called Apple.

Tribble went to work directly for Steve Jobs on Apple’s most ambitious project at the time– the Macintosh. And he quickly learned, along with the rest of the Macintosh team, that Jobs’ management style was relentless, maniacal, and irrational… bordering on insane.

Steve Jobs famously dismissed his engineers’ doubts about whether they’d even be able to design such an audacious product. And he certainly didn’t care about minor inconveniences like the laws of physics or what was technologically achievable at the time. To Jobs, nothing was impossible. Full stop.

Tribble later enshrined this attitude as the “Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field,” where a sort of techno-evangelism and intellectual swagger combined with unbridled optimism to bend the truth to whatever Jobs wanted to believe… or what he wanted everyone else to believe.

And most people were captivated by it; in fact, it was this Reality Distortion Field that transformed Apple’s customers into almost cult-like followers who camp out for days in advance of a new product launch.

It also had its drawbacks; in fact, the same Reality Distortion Field caused Jobs to almost bankrupt his company NeXT simply so that its desktop computer would be a perfect cube.

I thought about this recently because the Reality Distortion Field it’s the most appropriate way to characterize America’s fiscal condition.

The US national debt is now $36.2 trillion– a number which will skyrocket in a few months after Congress increases the debt ceiling. If you count “off-balance sheet” debts, which include unfunded amounts owed to future Social Security and Medicare recipients, total liabilities are around $100 trillion.

And these are numbers grow worse at an alarming rate.

Federal spending has already reached a point where ALL government tax revenue is spent just on mandatory entitlements plus interest on the debt.

In other words, 100% of discretionary spending, which includes the military, national parks, and homeland security, must be financed with more debt.

Interest on that national debt is now more than military spending; and the annual interest bill is also growing very rapidly– it will exceed $1 trillion this year, more than 20% of tax revenue.

If that weren’t bad enough, Social Security’s primary trust fund is set to run out of money in 7-8 years, resulting in an immediate cut to benefits on the order of about 20% to 25%. Bailing out the program will require trillions of dollars just as a down payment.

Yet just like Jobs routinely dismissed the extreme challenges of his projects, many of the major players in global finance dismiss the US government’s horrific fiscal condition.

They look at the gruesome, unholy numbers and conclude, “Everything’s going to be fine, there’s no problem here.”  It’s reality distortion at its finest.

The media. Big Wall Street banks. Politicians. Seemingly everyone has a vested interest in rejecting any concern over the US government finances.

Ratings agencies have also been under the spell of America’s Reality Distortion Field; these are the guys who are tasked with providing an honest assessment of a government’s creditworthiness. Yet for decades they insisted that America should still have the highest, pristine, AAA rating.

S&P was the first to break the spell more than 10 years ago, followed by Fitch. This past Friday, the last of the ‘Big 3 agencies’, Moody’s, broke the spell and exited the Reality Distortion Field.

All three have now downgraded America’s sovereign credit rating.

Do these agencies really matter, and have their downgrades really changed anything?

Not really. In theory, a lower rating means that the US government should have to pay a higher interest rate when it borrows money from the bond market. But sovereign ratings are pretty meaningless for wealthy countries.

Japan has a lower credit rating than the US, yet it still enjoys near-zero interest rates. Australia has a higher rating, yet the bond market demands much higher interest rates on Australian government bonds.

So ultimately, the Moody’s downgrade is really just a symbol of more and more major financial players escaping the Reality Distortion Field.

Another big group that’s starting to break the spell is foreign governments and central banks, who, for decades, have entrusted trillions of dollars of their savings to the belief of America’s endless power.

Yet from Joe Biden shaking hands with thin air to Liberation Day chaos to naval fighter jets falling into the ocean, the past few years have proven to them that America is no longer the trusted and reliable partner it once was.

This is why foreign governments and central banks started to diversify rather aggressively away from the US dollar beginning in 2023-2024. And this is a really big deal considering that foreign institutions own about HALF of all US marketable, fixed rate government debt.

Losing foreign demand for US dollars and US government bonds would require the Fed to print trillions of dollars make up the difference… which would almost certainly result in substantial inflation in the US.

And that leads me to the most important story from last week; it wasn’t Moody’s downgrade, which was simply stating the obvious. It was the President’s trip to the Middle East.

Donald Trump is very much like Steve Jobs in his reality distortion; he seems to be ignoring the obvious, looming debt crisis based on a belief that America will always be OK.

Frankly, this approach is dangerous, because it encourages complacency, inaction, and inertia in Congress… hence the House’s push for a “Big Beautiful” bill which carries a $2 trillion annual budget deficit.

I would be much better for the country if the President were preaching fiscal responsibility and pushing Congress to cut spending. This isn’t happening.

Yet on the bright side, POTUS did manage to secure a substantial commitment from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

I’m not talking about the reported trillions of dollars of investment, but rather the fact that relationships with those oil-producing nations have been cemented.

This is critical; as I wrote weeks ago, Saudi Arabia is the ironic linchpin that may secure the US dollar’s status as the global reserve currency.

Back in the 1970s when Richard Nixon took the US dollar off the gold standard, Saudi Arabia made a decision to continue its currency peg with the dollar.

Consequently, every other country on the planet that wanted to buy oil from Saudi Arabia (i.e. pretty much everyone) still needed to hold US dollars.

Saudi Arabia’s decision in the 1970s ensured that foreign demand for US dollars and US government bonds would continue.

Similarly, after what happened last week in Riyadh, it seems pretty clear that Saudi Arabia is making the same decision and will stick with the United States.

And that might just have bought America a little bit more time to get its act together. Hopefully it will be time well spent.

To your freedom,

James Hickman
Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign and
Grey Swan

P.S. from Addison: If the private sector could grow substantially faster, say, 8-10% per year, then the U.S. government could keep running today’s big deficits without increasing our debt-to-GDP ratio.

The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio spiked during the pandemic lockdowns. And even now after taming a bit, it’s still running at 122%.

At the 130% level, countries have historically hit a point of no return.

Once a debt crisis starts, it’s very hard to stop. Even with all the gusto of the Trump administration, a tipping point debt crisis is still  a very real possibility worth keeping an eye as we do here.

We’ve been hearing that, “the U.S. economy will  grow its way out of a crisis” since interviewing Warren Buffett, Alan Greenspan and Paul Volcker for IOUSA in 2005-06.

This time really would be different if we were able to get the U.S. economy to historic Chinese growth rates of the past two decades. Are we really willing to bet the farm on that possibility?

Your thoughts? Please send them here: addison@greyswanfraternity.com


Grey Swan Forecast #6: China Annexes Taiwan — Without a Shot Fired

December 26, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Our forecast will feel obvious in hindsight and controversial in advance — the hallmark of a Grey Swan.

Most analysts we speak to are thinking in terms of the history of Western conflict. 

They expect full-frontal military engagement.

Beijing, from our modest perch, prefers resolution because resolution compounds its power. Why sacrifice the workshop of the world, when cajoling and bribery will do?

Taiwan will not fall.

It will merge.

Grey Swan Forecast #6: China Annexes Taiwan — Without a Shot Fired
Grey Swan Forecast #7: A Global Debt Crisis Will Reprice Democracy

December 24, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Wars, technology races, and political upheavals — all of them rest on fiscal capacity.

In 2026, that capacity will tighten across the developed world simultaneously. Democracies will discover that generosity financed by debt carries conditions, whether voters approve of them or not.

Bond markets will not shout so much as clear their throats. Repeatedly.

Grey Swan Forecast #7: A Global Debt Crisis Will Reprice Democracy
Seven Grey Swans, One Year Later

December 23, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Taken together, the seven Grey Swans of 2025 behaved less like isolated events and more like interlocking stories readers already recognize.

The year moved in phases. A sharp April selloff cleared leverage quickly. Policy shifted toward tax relief, lighter regulation, and renewed tolerance for liquidity. Innovations began to slowly dominate the marketplace conversation – from Dollar 2.0 digital assets to AI-powered applications in all manner of commercial enterprises, ranging from airline and hotel bookings to driverless taxis and robots. 

Seven Grey Swans, One Year Later
2025: The Lens We Used — Fire, Transition, and What’s Next… The Boom!

December 22, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Back in April, when we published what we called the Trump Great Reset Strategy, we described the grand realignment we believed President Trump and his acolytes were embarking on in three phases.

At the time, it read like a conceptual map. As the months passed, it began to feel like a set of operating instructions written in advance of turbulence.

As you can expect, any grandiose plan would get all kinds of blowback… but this year exhibited all manner of Trump Derangement Syndrome on top of the difficulty of steering a sclerotic empire clear of the rocky shores.

The “phases” were never about optimism or pessimism. They were about sequencing — how stress surfaces, how systems adapt, and what must hold before confidence can regenerate. And in the end, what do we do with our money?!

2025: The Lens We Used — Fire, Transition, and What’s Next… The Boom!