It Turns Out Our Gold Analysis Is Conservative…

“Money is by nature gold and silver.”

– Karl Marx

March 21, 2025 — As we look through the winners and losers of the MAGA economy this week, gold has been re-asserting its role as the antidote to uncertainty and volatility.

The metal has hit a few new historic highs, and — as is its wont when that happens — it has goosed the mainstream news cycle in a few unique ways.

Since the start of the year, President Trump and the new media darling, first buddy Elon Musk, have openly fantasized about taking a trip to Fort Knox to see America’s gold stockpile.

Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury, has suggested that revaluing the gold in Fort Knox would help him in an effort to balance the nation’s books. Or some such creative financing at the federal level…

Even in the Grey Swan community, there are whispers of specific hard asset financiers whom we know who would be tasked with helping the Treasury with the revaluation effort.

“The News” also reports that vast amounts of physical gold have been transported from vaults in London to vaults in New York so that big Wall Street banks can hedge their bets on the SPDR Gold Shares ETF GLD.

In fact, according to the reports, so much gold has moved stateside in recent months that it’s showing up in America’s import/export numbers, causing algorithms to sell off stocks for fear of a shifting economy.

Last year, well before the idea of auditing Fort Knox was ever floated, we followed some macroeconomic trends and released research suggesting that gold prices could be in for a massive move higher, potentially over $20,000 per ounce.

The number seemed ridiculous at first glance. We had to do the calculations and recheck our premises several times.

Consider this.

Gold went from $42 per ounce set by the U.S. government in 1971 to over $800 by the end of that tumultuous decade, by market forces alone.

That’s what investors call a 20-bagger.

Today, a 20-bagger would put gold closer to $60,000, triple our conservative estimates from October.

With that in mind, if you’ll allow us to continue to entertain ourselves with speculation, we turn today to Grey Swan contributor Lau Vegas. Enjoy. ~~Addison

The Great Revaluation: Why the U.S. Could Be Quietly Returning to Gold

Lau Vegys, Doug Casey’s Crisis Investing and Grey Swan

Earlier this week, I wrote about gold breaking past $3,000 per ounce — a new all-time high.

But what if I told you the U.S. government still values its gold at just $42.22 per ounce?

That’s not a typo. The official book value of America’s gold reserves hasn’t changed since 1973.

That price was set under the Par Value Modification Act, a relic of the Bretton Woods system, and has remained frozen for accounting purposes—even as gold’s market price has skyrocketed.

Turn Your Images On

The result? The 261.5 million ounces of gold the U.S. (supposedly) holds are officially valued at just $11 billion. At market prices, they’d be worth nearly $785 billion.

That’s a textbook example of America undervaluing its assets if I ever saw one. Not a problem in regular times, but a serious oversight in an era of nearly $37 trillion in debt, out-of-control deficits, and accelerating de-dollarization.

We believe revaluing U.S. gold holdings could be the first major move in Team Trump’s grand strategy.

Simply marking these reserves to market prices would strengthen the nation’s balance sheet and give the government more leverage in devaluing the dollar—a key piece in Trump’s broader economic reset.

Pegging the dollar to gold at a much higher price post-devaluation would also drastically reduce the real burden of U.S. debt.

Doug Casey: The dollar started out as a receipt for a specific amount of physical gold, 1/20th of an ounce. Is it possible Trump will raise the price of gold to a level where the dollar is again redeemable? I’d say yes. It would be part of the solution to the $37 trillion national debt.

Why?

Think about it—if gold were revalued from $3,000 to $10,000 per ounce, the U.S. government’s gold reserves would suddenly be worth more than three times their current value. That increase in balance sheet value could be leveraged to retire debt—yes, either directly or through gold-backed bonds—but also to stabilize the dollar post-devaluation (or help fund Trump’s broader re-industrialization agenda).

And keep in mind—the U.S. faces $8.5–9.2 trillion in maturing debt in 2025 alone. Under current conditions, that’s not going to be easy to refinance without spiking interest rates or shaking confidence in Treasuries.

Turn Your Images On

The bottom line is that Trump’s Reset could be the most significant shift in the monetary system since August 15, 1971—the day Nixon cut the dollar’s last tie to gold.

And if you look at what’s happening in the markets right now, the signs suggest the U.S. is already laying the groundwork.

For example, since December 2024, COMEX has imported around 674 metric tons of physical gold—a hefty amount on its own. But when you factor in non-COMEX imports, the total goes up to 2,000 tons—64 million ounces—brought into the U.S. between December and February. That’s nearly a quarter of all the gold the U.S. government officially claims in its reserves.

That’s not normal market behavior. Someone with deep pockets—likely the Treasury or the Fed—is aggressively stockpiling physical gold with no concern for price.

Gold at $22,000?

Now, in case you missed it, Doug’s quote above contains a key word: redeemable.

That doesn’t mean we’re banking on a full return to the gold standard right away, but I can easily see the U.S. taking incremental steps to stabilize the system and rebuild confidence in a devalued dollar by gradually moving back toward gold.

And guess what? Even partial backing would send gold soaring. Take a look at the chart below—it shows the gold price needed to back different U.S. money supplies, from M0 (physical cash) to M1 and M2, which also include savings accounts and time deposits.

Turn Your Images On

As you can see, backing just M0—the narrowest measure of money, which includes physical cash in circulation and reserves held by banks at the Fed—could push gold past $22,000 per ounce. M1 would require $68,827, and M2 a staggering $79,699.

This just goes to show that while the final long-term price would depend on the level of backing (e.g., 20% vs. 100%), even if the U.S. government chooses to only partially restore monetary credibility, gold prices will skyrocket.

Sounds great, right? Well, sure—if you already own gold. But it comes with a massive dollar devaluation.

And, yes, this also means that anyone not holding gold and other “real stuff”—like silver, natural resources, and commodities—is going to see a dramatic drop in their standard of living.

Regards,
Lau Vegys, Doug Casey’s Crisis Investing and Grey Swan

P.S. from Addison: Meanwhile, our latest research on the real, unique, story behind the border crisis with Mexico is available to view here. Paid-up Fraternity members can immediately access our Library of Special Reports.

And it’s not too late to review our research from last year on the best places to benefit from today’s rising gold prices. After all, there’s now a strong chance that our prediction is wrong… at least in the sense that it is far too conservative given events unfolding in the gold market.

If you like to speculate a little yourself, please send your thoughts on what a gold revaluation would look like and what it would do to your long-term gold investing plans to addison@greyswanfraternity.com. It’s Friday, g’head.

“Money is by nature gold and silver.”

– Karl Marx

March 21, 2025 — As we look through the winners and losers of the MAGA economy this week, gold has been re-asserting its role as the antidote to uncertainty and volatility.

The metal has hit a few new historic highs, and — as is its wont when that happens — it has goosed the mainstream news cycle in a few unique ways.

Since the start of the year, President Trump and the new media darling, first buddy Elon Musk, have openly fantasized about taking a trip to Fort Knox to see America’s gold stockpile.

Even in the Grey Swan community, there are whispers of specific hard asset financiers whom we know who would be tasked with helping the Treasury with the revaluation effort.

The number seemed ridiculous at first glance. We had to do the calculations and recheck our premises several times.

Consider this.

Gold went from $42 per ounce set by the U.S. government in 1971 to over $800 by the end of that tumultuous decade, by market forces alone.

That’s what investors call a 20-bagger.

Today, a 20-bagger would put gold closer to $60,000, triple our conservative estimates from October.

With that in mind, if you’ll allow us to continue to entertain ourselves with speculation, we turn today to Grey Swan contributor Lau Vegas. Enjoy. ~~Addison

The Great Revaluation: Why the U.S. Could Be Quietly Returning to Gold

Lau Vegys, Doug Casey’s Crisis Investing and Grey Swan

Earlier this week, I wrote about gold breaking past $3,000 per ounce — a new all-time high.

But what if I told you the U.S. government still values its gold at just $42.22 per ounce?

That’s not a typo. The official book value of America’s gold reserves hasn’t changed since 1973.

That price was set under the Par Value Modification Act, a relic of the Bretton Woods system, and has remained frozen for accounting purposes—even as gold’s market price has skyrocketed.

Turn Your Images On

The result? The 261.5 million ounces of gold the U.S. (supposedly) holds are officially valued at just $11 billion. At market prices, they’d be worth nearly $785 billion.

We believe revaluing U.S. gold holdings could be the first major move in Team Trump’s grand strategy.

Pegging the dollar to gold at a much higher price post-devaluation would also drastically reduce the real burden of U.S. debt.

Why?

Turn Your Images On

The bottom line is that Trump’s Reset could be the most significant shift in the monetary system since August 15, 1971—the day Nixon cut the dollar’s last tie to gold.

And if you look at what’s happening in the markets right now, the signs suggest the U.S. is already laying the groundwork.

That’s not normal market behavior. Someone with deep pockets—likely the Treasury or the Fed—is aggressively stockpiling physical gold with no concern for price.

Gold at $22,000?

Now, in case you missed it, Doug’s quote above contains a key word: redeemable.

Turn Your Images On

Sounds great, right? Well, sure—if you already own gold. But it comes with a massive dollar devaluation.

And, yes, this also means that anyone not holding gold and other “real stuff”—like silver, natural resources, and commodities—is going to see a dramatic drop in their standard of living.

Regards,
Lau Vegys, Doug Casey’s Crisis Investing and Grey Swan

America has consistently reinvented itself in times of crisis. The founders survived monarchy. Lincoln survived disunion. We’ve survived bank panics, oil shocks, stagflation, and disco. We’ll survive deplatforming, too.

The Second American Revolution won’t be fought with muskets or manifestos. It won’t be fought with petty violence and street demonstrations. It will be written into code. And available to those who wish to take advantage of it.

Russell Kirk called the first American Revolution “a revolution not made, but prevented.” The second will be the same. We’re not tearing down the house — we’re going to rewire it in code.

The result may not be utopia. But it will be freedom you can bank on.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called stablecoins, including USDC, “a pillar of dollar strength,” estimating a $2 trillion market within five years. U.S. Treasuries back every coin.

Bessent’s formula even suggests that a broader, more efficient market for US dollars will help retain its best use case as the reserve currency of global finance… and, perhaps, help the current administration address the nation’s $37 trillion mountain of debt.

In trying to cancel a man, the establishment accidentally reinforced the dollar, and may add decades to its life as a useful currency.

As we approach the 250th anniversary of the United States, it’s worth recalling that our first Revolution wasn’t waged to destroy an order — it was fought to preserve one.

Political philosopher Russell Kirk called it “a revolution not made but prevented.” The colonists sought not chaos but continuity — the defense of their “chartered rights as Englishmen,” not the birth of an entirely new world. Kirk wrote:

“The American Revolution was a preventive movement, intended to preserve an old constitutional structure. The French Revolution meant the destruction of the fabric of society.”

The difference, Kirk argued, was moral. The American Revolution was rooted in ordered liberty; the French in ideological frenzy. The first produced a Constitution; the second, a guillotine.

Two and a half centuries later, the argument continues — only now, the battlefield is financial. Who controls access to money? Who defines legitimacy? Can a citizen’s ability to transact depend on their politics?

Trump and Powell are no buddies. They’ve been fighting over rate cuts all year—Trump demanding more, Powell holding back. Even after cutting twice, Trump called him “grossly incompetent” and said he’d “love to fire” him. The tension has been building for months.

And Trump now seems ready to install someone who shares his appetite for lower rates and easier money.

Trump has been dropping hints for weeks—saying on November 18, “I think I already know my choice,” and then doubling down last Sunday aboard Air Force One with, “I know who I am going to pick… we’ll be announcing it.”

He was referring to one Kevin Hassett, who—according to a recent Bloomberg report—has emerged as the overwhelming favorite to become the next Fed chair.