GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Daily Missive

How Many Divisions Does Elon Have?

Loading ...Bill Bonner

February 19, 2025 • 4 minute, 38 second read


budgetDOGEElonsavings

How Many Divisions Does Elon Have?

“The only real power comes out of a long rifle.”

—Joseph Stalin


 

February 19, 2025— The question was framed, according to some historians, by Josef Stalin at the Potsdam Conference. Winston Churchill had suggested that the Pope might be brought in to provide moral backing to the Allies’ campaigns against Hitler.

Stalin must have wondered how morality would hold up against Panzer tanks.

“How many divisions does the Pope have?” he allegedly asked.

We wish we could be in the room when the question comes again.

Of all the bloated bureaucracies…among all the corrupt and self-serving federales… and all their boondoggle programs — the military stands out. It fails every audit. It spends trillions, and claims not to know where the money goes.

But it goes somewhere. And those who get it know where it went. They’ve bought and paid for almost every member of the House and the Senate. They’ve put on countless half-time shows…and granted ‘access’ only to toady journalists. They expect to get their money’s worth.

In ancient Egypt, the surplus production of the Nile Valley was spent building monuments to dead rulers. In China, under the first emperor, Qin Shi Huang, much of the surplus output was spent building a Terracotta Army of more than 8,000 soldiers, intended to protect him in the afterlife.

And in America, circa 2025, ‘national defense’ is a sacred myth. Having U.S. troops all over the world…meddling in one foreign conflict after another…trying to replace independent leaders with puppets — all in, it costs over a trillion dollars a year…and almost surely makes Americans less safe.

But now, the U.S. firepower industry may be coming under attack. According to the Washington Post, Musk’s shock troops have crossed the Potomac:

The Trump administration has directed defense agencies to turn over a list of their probationary employees by the end of Tuesday, with the expectation that many could be laid off as soon as this week, according to five people familiar with the matter.

The directive coincides with the arrival at the Pentagon of personnel from Elon Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service, which has overseen the firing of thousands of probationary employees in other federal agencies and coordinated the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

“Uh… you want to see our records?” the brass will ask…stunned and confused as Elon and his band of callow nerds arrive at the Pentagon.

“That’s classified,” they will reply.

“We’re here to root out waste,” Elon will explain.

“No useless aircraft? No easily sunk ships? Close unnecessary bases? Stop useless weapons development? Fire some of the three million people who get our paychecks? Tighten our belts? Cancel our beach-house plans?”

“Yeah… that’s right,” Elon might reply.

“What about our enemies?” they’ll ask.

“What enemies?” Elon will reply. “You know perfectly well that there is no country on earth capable of crossing the ocean with a viable armada. They’d be wiped out by missiles and bombers before even leaving port.”

“Uh… what about Russia… China… terrorists?”

“Are you kidding? Russia has a tiny economy. China’s economy depends on selling stuff to Americans, not attacking them. And terrorists have never been anything more than a fake enemy.”

But it’s one thing to reduce spending by USAID. It’s another to reduce it for the U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force. The last time the Pentagon had to cut its budget was after WWII. The troops came home. Soldiers were ‘de-mobed.’ Eisenhower (who knew more about the military than any president since) peeled nearly 30% off the Department of Defense outlays.

That was then…before firepower became the nation’s defining industry, with effective control over both political parties. Today, for appearances sake, the warfighters are likely to shed a few ‘probationary’ employees. Maybe they’ll sacrifice some weapons that they never wanted anyway.

But why should the world’s ‘most lethal’ fighting force take its orders from an immigrant from Africa? Sooner or later, whether voiced or tacit, the question is bound to come up:

“And how many divisions do you have, Elon?”

Regards,

Bill Bonner
Grey Swan Honorary Member, via Substack

P.S. Before DOGE even tackles the Department of Defense’s spending, it’s managed to save taxpayers over $112 billion so far, according to DebtClock.

Turn Your Images On

That’s about $700 per taxpayer in annual savings. Not too shabby.

However, there’s now some talk about sending some of the savings back to taxpayers.

Given the $36.5 trillion national debt, which still continues to tick higher at a faster rate than DOGE can find savings, perhaps the best use of DOGE right now is to move away from today’s perilously high debt-to-GDP ratio.

As we noted in research last year, the Federal Reserve went “in the red” in 2022. Instead of earning money on its holdings and sending its surplus to the U.S. Treasury, the central bank is sitting on record losses caused by soaring bond yields.

If DOGE can’t make good on Elon Musk’s promise to reduce the deficit by $1 trillion annually, the math suggests that America’s debt will snowball from here. Bond investors will want increasingly higher yields, and the end result will likely be a hyperinflationary episode that permanently wrecks the dollar.

Gee, no wonder people can’t seem to get enough physical gold. For more on our forecast on what’s possible for the gold price in the short-term, click here.

Send your comments to addison@greyswanfraternity.com. Thank you in advance.


The Challenge Ahead for Trump’s Crypto Task Force

June 27, 2025 • Ian King

Right now, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are battling over whether certain cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities or commodities.

And there is ongoing debate over whether stablecoins should fall under banking regulations.

The task force needs to ensure that these issues are resolved.

It also needs to ensure that crypto businesses are regulated in a way that allows them to benefit from being decentralized, yet still offers their stakeholders some protections.

And with the IRS increasing scrutiny on crypto transactions, the task force should review tax policies, exemptions and reporting thresholds.

But these issues can be solved with some foresight.

With the proper regulations in place, crypto businesses like Maker and Aave have the potential to truly go mainstream.

And this will solidify Satoshi’s vision of decentralized financial system, built from the ground up. 

The Challenge Ahead for Trump’s Crypto Task Force
America’s Just 12.3% of the Problem

June 27, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

After a spike during the pandemic,  U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is still over 120% – and climbing again.

Historically, no country that crossed the 130%  debt-to-GDP ratio has been able to survive long enough to “grow its way out” of a debt crisis.

Therein lies the tension. The Trump Reset formula requires an extension of his first-term tax cuts, low and fair tariffs… and low interest rates.

America’s Just 12.3% of the Problem
Wall Street’s Huffing On AI Fumes, Again

June 27, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

It’s fair to say, the market’s resilience isn’t coming from strength in the real economy—it’s running on the fumes of AI exuberance, deregulation promises, and the chance that the Trump administration might delay its July 9 tariff hammer.

Wall Street’s Huffing On AI Fumes, Again
Is Crypto Now a Matter of National Security?

June 26, 2025 • Ian King

The passage of the GENIUS Act is a step in the right direction. It brings much-needed clarity to stablecoins and shows that lawmakers are finally taking digital assets seriously.

But we need to go further.

If we want to control the rails of the coming financial era, then we have to view crypto as part of our national infrastructure.

The U.S. has an opportunity to lead in this space.

But only if we treat the digital realm like a new layer of national power. One that needs to be protected, regulated and defended when necessary.

Otherwise, we could end up on the wrong side of a technology we helped build.

And that would be a loss with consequences far beyond crypto.

Is Crypto Now a Matter of National Security?