GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2026 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

Fiscal Outlook 76 Options for Reducing the Deficit

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

January 15, 2025 • 3 minute, 57 second read


debtspending

Fiscal Outlook 76 Options for Reducing the Deficit

From the Peter G. Peterson Foundation:

 

Debt in the United States is already the size of our entire economy and is projected to grow much higher. Fortunately, there are many ways to stabilize our fiscal outlook. Recently, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released 76 policy options — spanning both revenues and spending — that could help bring the country’s rising debt under control. Below are some of the policy options that would have the largest effects.

Options for Raising Federal Revenues

CBO presents 32 options that would affect revenues. Some provisions are likely to be part of the debate in 2025 as legislators revisit expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; others would modify unrelated provisions or create new types of taxes.

Eliminate or Limit Itemized Deductions: The largest option to reduce the deficit would be to eliminate all itemized deductions, which benefit taxpayers when the value of their deductions exceeds the amount of the standard deduction. That would reduce deficits by $3.4 trillion over the 10-year period from 2025 to 2034. Subsets of such reform include eliminating just the state and local tax deduction or limiting the tax benefit of itemized deductions to a certain percentage of their value.

Impose a 5 Percent Value-Added Tax: A value-added tax (VAT) is a consumption tax imposed on the incremental increase in the value of a good or service that occurs at each stage of a supply chain until the item is sold. Applying a 5 percent VAT would decrease the deficit by between $2.2 trillion and $3.4 trillion over 10 years, depending on the size of the base to which it is applied.

Impose a New Payroll Tax: The current payroll tax is levied on the earnings of people who work for an employer and on the net earnings of people who are self-employed and used to support programs such as Social Security and Medicare. CBO estimated the amount that could be raised by a new payroll tax that would be part of general revenues of either 1 percent ($1.3 trillion raised over the 2025-2034 period) or 2 percent ($2.5 trillion raised).

Impose a Surtax on Individuals’ Adjusted Gross Income: Most individual income is taxed on an amount that is reduced by certain deductions or exemptions. CBO estimated an option that would impose a surtax on a broader measure of income (adjusted gross income). Depending on the parameters of such a surtax (as defined in CBO’s option), it could garner between $1.1 trillion and $1.4 trillion in revenues over the 10-year period.

Options for Decreasing Mandatory Spending

CBO also presents 27 options that affect mandatory spending, which includes programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. As those three programs are the largest categories of mandatory spending in the U.S. budget, reforming them has the potential to create the most savings.

Modify Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans for Health Risk: Medicare Advantage plans cover more than half of all Medicare beneficiaries. CBO offers three options to save money in Medicare Advantage by reducing payments to the program across-the-board or by making changes to its risk-adjustment policy. Savings from those policy measures range from $124 billion to $1 trillion over 10 years.

Establish Caps on Federal Spending for Medicaid: Currently, the federal government provides the majority of Medicaid’s funding and that funding has no ceiling — larger federal payments are generated automatically if enrollment or cost per enrollee increases. CBO estimates that if caps were established for total funding provided for each state, the government could save $459 billion over the projection period; establishing caps for the cost per enrollee, as specified by CBO, could generate savings of $893 billion over 10 years.

Establish a Uniform Social Security Benefit: Social Security benefits are calculated based on an individual’s average lifetime earnings, so individuals with higher earnings receive more retirement benefits than beneficiaries with lower earnings. CBO estimates that providing every beneficiary the same amount — either 150 percent or 125 percent of the federal poverty level — could save $283 billion or $607 billion, respectively, over the 10-year period.

Options for Decreasing Discretionary Spending

CBO provides 17 options that would affect discretionary spending. As nearly half of all discretionary spending is for defense, the option reforming that budget category has the greatest potential for deficit reduction.

Reduce the Department of Defense’s Annual Budget: According to CBO, addressing the Department of Defense’s annual budget could save $959 billion over the next 10 years. Reducing the number of active-component military personnel, reducing ground combat and air combat units, or relying on allies to provide their own defenses rather than using a U.S. combat force are possible methods of achieving the reform.

Although the United States carries significant debt due to a structural mismatch between spending and revenues, the new Administration and Congress have many possible options to address that gap.

 

Image by: Tom Brenner/Getty Images

Source: Peter G. Peterson Foundation


A Look at Precious Metals As Prices Soar

January 14, 2026 • Shad Marquitz

Let’s peel back the layers of this precious metals bull market by analyzing the pricing action on the charts, which contains ALL the buying and selling.

Most people love a good narrative, and they use these stories to either reinforce their biased views or to explain away price action that they don’t agree with.

They are just stories, though, even if there are elements of truth embedded within them. We can utilize charts to remove this biased narrative and noise.

Over the longer term, the pricing that populates charts truly incorporates the total buying and selling from all central banks, financial institutions, ETFs, hedge funds, whale investors, and the rest of the retail investors.

A Look at Precious Metals As Prices Soar
The Empire As Junkyard Dog

January 14, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

Yesterday’s CPI showed prices still ticking up—2.7% year-over-year, right in line with expectations.

Wall Street expects at least two rate cuts in 2026. At the same time, global central banks — led by China and Russia — continue buying gold to reduce their reliance on the dollar. Combine this with supply chain reshoring and increasing geopolitical tensions, and metals have emerged as both a hedge and a haven.

Between a precious metals rally catching the attention of outlets as lilywhite as Bloomberg and the Trump administration’s 2026 focus on critical minerals and domestic production, there’s a lot to unearth in the natural resource sector.

The Empire As Junkyard Dog
Affordability, Meet Reflation

January 14, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

Today’s chart of inflation reflects an eerily similar path to the 1970s. The last CPI reading ticked back up 2.7%. If prices today continue to track those of the 1970s, the next wave of inflation could see prices rise higher and faster than during the 2021/2022 bout.

Yesterday, gold notched another new record high of $4647. Its slimmer, svelte cousin, silver, set a new historic high of $92. Both monetary metals are reflecting the market fear that once inflation gets started, it’s very difficult to contain.

Affordability, Meet Reflation
The Grand Realignment Gets Personal

January 13, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

Sunday night, Powell addressed the probe head-on in a video post — a rarity. He accused the White House of using cost overruns in the Fed’s HQ renovation as a pretext for political interference.

The White House denied involvement. But few in Washington believed it.

What followed was bipartisan condemnation of the investigation. Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yellen co-signed a blistering rebuke, warning the U.S. was starting to resemble “emerging markets with weak institutions.”

The Grand Realignment Gets Personal