GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2026 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

Fiscal Outlook 76 Options for Reducing the Deficit

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

January 15, 2025 • 3 minute, 57 second read


debtspending

Fiscal Outlook 76 Options for Reducing the Deficit

From the Peter G. Peterson Foundation:

 

Debt in the United States is already the size of our entire economy and is projected to grow much higher. Fortunately, there are many ways to stabilize our fiscal outlook. Recently, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released 76 policy options — spanning both revenues and spending — that could help bring the country’s rising debt under control. Below are some of the policy options that would have the largest effects.

Options for Raising Federal Revenues

CBO presents 32 options that would affect revenues. Some provisions are likely to be part of the debate in 2025 as legislators revisit expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; others would modify unrelated provisions or create new types of taxes.

Eliminate or Limit Itemized Deductions: The largest option to reduce the deficit would be to eliminate all itemized deductions, which benefit taxpayers when the value of their deductions exceeds the amount of the standard deduction. That would reduce deficits by $3.4 trillion over the 10-year period from 2025 to 2034. Subsets of such reform include eliminating just the state and local tax deduction or limiting the tax benefit of itemized deductions to a certain percentage of their value.

Impose a 5 Percent Value-Added Tax: A value-added tax (VAT) is a consumption tax imposed on the incremental increase in the value of a good or service that occurs at each stage of a supply chain until the item is sold. Applying a 5 percent VAT would decrease the deficit by between $2.2 trillion and $3.4 trillion over 10 years, depending on the size of the base to which it is applied.

Impose a New Payroll Tax: The current payroll tax is levied on the earnings of people who work for an employer and on the net earnings of people who are self-employed and used to support programs such as Social Security and Medicare. CBO estimated the amount that could be raised by a new payroll tax that would be part of general revenues of either 1 percent ($1.3 trillion raised over the 2025-2034 period) or 2 percent ($2.5 trillion raised).

Impose a Surtax on Individuals’ Adjusted Gross Income: Most individual income is taxed on an amount that is reduced by certain deductions or exemptions. CBO estimated an option that would impose a surtax on a broader measure of income (adjusted gross income). Depending on the parameters of such a surtax (as defined in CBO’s option), it could garner between $1.1 trillion and $1.4 trillion in revenues over the 10-year period.

Options for Decreasing Mandatory Spending

CBO also presents 27 options that affect mandatory spending, which includes programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. As those three programs are the largest categories of mandatory spending in the U.S. budget, reforming them has the potential to create the most savings.

Modify Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans for Health Risk: Medicare Advantage plans cover more than half of all Medicare beneficiaries. CBO offers three options to save money in Medicare Advantage by reducing payments to the program across-the-board or by making changes to its risk-adjustment policy. Savings from those policy measures range from $124 billion to $1 trillion over 10 years.

Establish Caps on Federal Spending for Medicaid: Currently, the federal government provides the majority of Medicaid’s funding and that funding has no ceiling — larger federal payments are generated automatically if enrollment or cost per enrollee increases. CBO estimates that if caps were established for total funding provided for each state, the government could save $459 billion over the projection period; establishing caps for the cost per enrollee, as specified by CBO, could generate savings of $893 billion over 10 years.

Establish a Uniform Social Security Benefit: Social Security benefits are calculated based on an individual’s average lifetime earnings, so individuals with higher earnings receive more retirement benefits than beneficiaries with lower earnings. CBO estimates that providing every beneficiary the same amount — either 150 percent or 125 percent of the federal poverty level — could save $283 billion or $607 billion, respectively, over the 10-year period.

Options for Decreasing Discretionary Spending

CBO provides 17 options that would affect discretionary spending. As nearly half of all discretionary spending is for defense, the option reforming that budget category has the greatest potential for deficit reduction.

Reduce the Department of Defense’s Annual Budget: According to CBO, addressing the Department of Defense’s annual budget could save $959 billion over the next 10 years. Reducing the number of active-component military personnel, reducing ground combat and air combat units, or relying on allies to provide their own defenses rather than using a U.S. combat force are possible methods of achieving the reform.

Although the United States carries significant debt due to a structural mismatch between spending and revenues, the new Administration and Congress have many possible options to address that gap.

 

Image by: Tom Brenner/Getty Images

Source: Peter G. Peterson Foundation


Why America’s Debt Bubble Is Accelerating

January 22, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

The last time Uncle Sam had this much debt rolling over, interest rates were effectively zero percent. That allowed for a massive expansion of total debt, even as total interest payouts shrank.

Why America’s Debt Bubble Is Accelerating
Frank Holmes: Trump’s Greenland Strategy Is Part of the New Arctic Power Struggle

January 21, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

Having said all that, why does President Trump want Greenland so badly (other than as retribution for not being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize)?

He insists it’s for national security, but, as I mentioned earlier, the U.S. military already has broad access to the island, as spelled out in the 1951 agreement signed by the U.S. and Denmark. Further, Greenland is under the protection of NATO, of which the U.S. is a member. If Russia or China tried to attack it, Article 5 of the treaty would be triggered, activating NATO forces.

Recent reporting suggests that some of Trump’s wealthiest backers see Greenland not as a military outpost or mining play, but as a blank slate. According to Reuters, influential tech investors—including Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen—have pitched the idea of turning parts of Greenland into a so-called “freedom city,” offering a low-regulation, quasi-autonomous hub for next-gen technologies.

Frank Holmes: Trump’s Greenland Strategy Is Part of the New Arctic Power Struggle
This Just In: Everything Is Terrible Again

January 21, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

Japan’s 40-year yield climbed to a record 4.21%.

Japan holds $1.2 trillion in U.S. Treasurys.

When their domestic yields spike, Japanese capital returns home. That means selling U.S. assets: stocks, bonds, ETFs. That selling pressure cascaded through the global financial system.

This mechanism isn’t new.

This Just In: Everything Is Terrible Again
The Great NATO Caper

January 21, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

Social spending in Europe has roughly doubled in the past 30 years. But only in 2025 has defense spending returned to levels last seen when the Berlin Wall was still standing.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimated on NBC’s Meet the Press over the weekend that the US has spent 22 trillion dollars on its commitment to NATO. Or, roughly two-thirds of the U.S.’s $38 trillion in national debt.
Social spending in Europe has roughly doubled in the past 30 years. But only in 2025 has defense spending returned to levels last seen when the Berlin Wall was still standing.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimated on NBC’s Meet the Press over the weekend that the US has spent 22 trillion dollars on its commitment to NATO. Or, roughly two-thirds of the U.S.’s $38 trillion in national debt.

The Great NATO Caper