Ripple Effect

Data So Bad, The Fed Buried It

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

July 28, 20251 minute, 28 second read



Data So Bad, The Fed Buried It

The Federal Reserve is sitting on a time bomb…

It has over $468 billion in unrealized losses.

That reflects assets on the balance sheet that are trading for much lower than what the bank paid for them.

Yes, that’s the Fed’s the job as “lender of last resort.” They buy stressed assets, swap them out with higher-quality ones, and then either absorb the loss or wait for prices to improve.

But here’s trouble. The Fed isn’t alone in holding unrealized losses.

The commercial banking system also saw its unrealized losses soar as the Fed started hiking interest rates in 2022. Three of the largest bank failures in US history occurred between March and May 2023.

It got so bad, so quickly, the Fed discontinued the data partway through the year:

Turn Your Images On

America’s banks were in trouble before the Fed finished hiking interest rates – so much so that
the central bank discontinued reporting the data.

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) – the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history in 2023 – grabbed the most headlines.

SVB had total losses of $16.1 billion alone—nearly 25% of the losses reported in 2022 a year earlier.

Today, with interest rates still relatively high, commercial banks continue to sit on massive losses.

The Fed’s existence is a paradox…

On paper, it’s supposed to smooth out economic cycles.

In reality, it tends to exacerbate them. Each crisis that brews is larger and more far-reaching than the last.

Since the 1987 crash, each crisis—which should be a time to clear out bad debts and start fresh—has been covered up with more and more freshly printed money.

Only this time is different.

The Fed became insolvent for the first time in its history in September 2022.

The crisis is coming to a head.

~ Addison


DASH and LOW Stock Have One Key Thing In Common

September 18, 2025Adam O'Dell

Sometimes, a compelling market trend flashes like a neon sign on the Vegas strip.

We’ve seen that a lot with mega trends like artificial intelligence (AI) over the last few years. Just last week, Oracle was rewarded with a 40% post-earnings pop in its stock price after a strong earnings outlook for its AI cloud business.

Other times, you’ve got to do a little work to find out what’s driving a stock’s price higher. And my “New Bulls” list each week is a great place to start.

DASH and LOW Stock Have One Key Thing In Common
The Carrot and The Stick

September 18, 2025Addison Wiggin

Incentives grow markets. Regulation stunts their fragile bones.

The Fed’s rate cuts are carrots. Markets are feasting on them. Over in the Grey Swan Trading Fraternity, Portfolio Director Andrew Packer added a long trade in the commodity market – in a small-cap player, producing a commodity domestically.

As a cherry on top, it might be the next MP Materials or Intel and get explicit government backing, which could really cause shares to take off.

Trump’s threats to the Fed, or the FCC’s jawboning of broadcasters, are sticks. Investors must decide which matters more.

As one market veteran told The Wall Street Journal: “Cheaper money is a carrot. But the bigger question is whether trust in our institutions can hold. Without that, the carrots won’t matter.”

The Carrot and The Stick
Nasdaq Enters Nosebleed Heights

September 18, 2025Addison Wiggin

If you follow technical indicators, the Nasdaq — a broad measure of tech stocks — is now “extremely overbought”… a level only seen in 0.4% of its history.

That’s less than half a percent, and it is likely the precursor to a correction when traders decide to take profits.

Our advice, “panic now, avoid the rush” and rotate your tech into hard assets such as gold , bitcoin, and commodities in general.

Nasdaq Enters Nosebleed Heights
Stefan Bartl: From Draining the Swamp to Owning Intel: Is the Right Becoming What It Feared?

September 17, 2025Addison Wiggin

As time unfolds, the US federal government’s tentacles burrow ever-deeper into the economy. In the 2008 crisis, banks deemed “too big to fail” received a government bailout. The following year, automobile firms GM and Chrysler were saved from bankruptcy. When the Treasury exited GM in 2013, taxpayers were left with a loss of more than $10 billion. Ten years later, the federal government forbade Nippon Steel to acquire US Steel, in a merger they both desired. Instead, the government settled for Nippon Steel to invest in US Steel alongside its own direct ownership of the firm via a “golden share.” Just this past week, the US federal government announced its 10 percent stake in Intel, the struggling US semiconductor giant. On top of the $7 billion Intel had already received from the 2024 CHIPS Act, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo called Intel “America’s champion semiconductor company.”

Stefan Bartl: From Draining the Swamp to Owning Intel: Is the Right Becoming What It Feared?