Cash Isn’t Trash, But It’s a Melting Ice Cube

Since its disconnect from gold in 1971, the U.S. dollar’s purchasing power has gone nearly straight down.

That’s created an uphill environment for savers. By the time you can save a buck — after your taxes and expenses — the dilution of the dollar continues to work against those savings.

That’s true of the simplest form of savings of all: Cash in a bank account.

Turn Your Images On

Even with relatively higher yields on cash today, money in the bank continues to lose value over time. (Source: X/Twitter)

Century-to-date, keeping cash in the bank has been a losing proposition.

The trend was the worst in the 2010s. Although inflation was moderate during that decade, and the Fed was arguably fighting deflation following the Great Financial Crisis, banks largely paid no interest to depositors.

That’s improved since the Fed aggressively raised interest rates in 2022-2023. Investors are almost getting a positive return after inflation.

But with rates coming down, potentially aggressively under a new Fed Chair next year, that trend will worsen.

Add it up, and it’s another reason why gold is a superior form of savings. Cash is more like an ice cube on a summer day – over time, its value will melt away.

~ Andrew

P.S. Remember, the Fed is expected to cut rates in September, with or without a new Fed Chairman.

Such a move risks kicking off a “most terrifying bull market” in stocks, which sends those valuations into the stratosphere before they come crashing down to earth. And it could help gold push higher.

But either way, it’s likely to push the dollar lower — and further punish savers.

Meanwhile, Grey Swan Live! returns tomorrow. We’ll be joined by Matt Clark, Chief Research Analyst at Money & Markets, one of our corporate affiliates.

Matt’s role is similar to mine as Portfolio Director — finding new investment opportunities and sifting through ever-shifting markets.

Matt is the only person I know who can find data and precise numbers faster than I can. Maybe that comes from his days as an investigative journalist.

But with markets hitting an air pocket this week and all eyes on Jackson Hole, this will be a timely and critical chat — exclusively for our paid-up Fraternity members.

If you have any questions for us about the market, send them our way now to: Addison@GreySwanFraternity.com.

Since its disconnect from gold in 1971, the U.S. dollar’s purchasing power has gone nearly straight down.

That’s created an uphill environment for savers. By the time you can save a buck — after your taxes and expenses — the dilution of the dollar continues to work against those savings.

That’s true of the simplest form of savings of all: Cash in a bank account.

Turn Your Images On

Even with relatively higher yields on cash today, money in the bank continues to lose value over time. (Source: X/Twitter)

Century-to-date, keeping cash in the bank has been a losing proposition.

That’s improved since the Fed aggressively raised interest rates in 2022-2023. Investors are almost getting a positive return after inflation.

But with rates coming down, potentially aggressively under a new Fed Chair next year, that trend will worsen.

Add it up, and it’s another reason why gold is a superior form of savings. Cash is more like an ice cube on a summer day – over time, its value will melt away.

~ Andrew

P.S. Remember, the Fed is expected to cut rates in September, with or without a new Fed Chairman.

But either way, it’s likely to push the dollar lower — and further punish savers.

Meanwhile, Grey Swan Live! returns tomorrow. We’ll be joined by Matt Clark, Chief Research Analyst at Money & Markets, one of our corporate affiliates.

Matt’s role is similar to mine as Portfolio Director — finding new investment opportunities and sifting through ever-shifting markets.

Matt is the only person I know who can find data and precise numbers faster than I can. Maybe that comes from his days as an investigative journalist.

But with markets hitting an air pocket this week and all eyes on Jackson Hole, this will be a timely and critical chat — exclusively for our paid-up Fraternity members.

If you have any questions for us about the market, send them our way now to: Addison@GreySwanFraternity.com.

Trump and Powell are no buddies. They’ve been fighting over rate cuts all year—Trump demanding more, Powell holding back. Even after cutting twice, Trump called him “grossly incompetent” and said he’d “love to fire” him. The tension has been building for months.

And Trump now seems ready to install someone who shares his appetite for lower rates and easier money.

Trump has been dropping hints for weeks—saying on November 18, “I think I already know my choice,” and then doubling down last Sunday aboard Air Force One with, “I know who I am going to pick… we’ll be announcing it.”

He was referring to one Kevin Hassett, who—according to a recent Bloomberg report—has emerged as the overwhelming favorite to become the next Fed chair.

Here we sit — investors, analysts, retirees, accountants, even a few masochistic economists — gathered beneath the leafless monetary tree, rehearsing our lines as we wait for Jerome Powell to step onstage and tell us what the future means.

Spoiler: he can’t. But that does not stop us from waiting.

Tomorrow, he is expected to deliver the December rate cut. Polymarket odds sit at 96% for a dainty 25-point cut.

Trump, Navarro and Lutnick pine for 50 points.

And somewhere in the wings smiles Kevin Hassett — at 74% odds this morning, the presumed Powell successor — watching the last few snowflakes fall before his cue arrives.

With U.S. stocks trading at about 24 times forward earnings, plans for capital growth have to go off without a hitch. Given the billions of dollars in commitments by AI companies, financing to the hilt on debt, the most realistic outcome is a hitch.

On a valuation basis, global markets will likely show better returns than U.S. stocks in 2026.

America leads the world in innovation. A U.S. tech stock will naturally fetch a higher price than, say, a German brewery. But value matters, too.

As copper flowed into the United States, LME inventories thinned and backwardation steepened. Higher U.S. pricing, tariff protection, and lower political risk made American warehouses the most attractive destination for metal. Each new shipment strengthened the spread.

The arbitrage, once triggered, became self-reinforcing. Traders were not participating in theory; they were responding to the physical incentives in front of them.

The United States had quietly become the marginal buyer of the world’s most important industrial metal. China, long the gravitational center of global copper demand, found itself on the outside.