America’s Ballooning Fiscal Gap Threatens to Blow Up Its Future

Lau Vegys, Doug Casey’s Crisis Investing

Today’s chart shows the path of U.S. government spending and revenues from 1989 to now, along with projections for the next 31 years.

See that gap between the lines? That’s where our debt comes from. Every year, when spending outpaces revenue, it’s like putting the difference on the national credit card.

Turn Your Images On

If you take a closer look, the late ’90s and early 2000s were the only time the government’s books weren’t a total mess. Revenues were up, spending was under control. We even toyed with the idea of paying off the national debt. Seems like a fairy tale now, doesn’t it?

But then the 2000s rolled in, and things took a turn. Wars, bailouts, you name it. The gap between what the government was taking in and what it was spending started to widen alarmingly. And just when we thought we’d seen it all, 2020 hit us like a freight train. COVID, lockdowns, stimulus checks galore. Government spending skyrocketed to 30% of GDP.

That was a recipe for a debt explosion, and that’s exactly what happened.

To put it in numbers, our national debt jumped from about $23 trillion at the start of 2020 to over $27 trillion by the end of the year. That’s a staggering $4.5 trillion increase in just one year! For perspective, it took the U.S. over 200 years to accumulate its first $4 trillion in debt.

At writing, we’re staring at $35.67 trillion and counting in national debt, with interest payments exceeding $1 trillion for the first time in history.

That’s grim, but the future doesn’t look any brighter. See that orange line stretching into the distance? That’s government spending, and it’s on an upward trajectory with no signs of slowing down. Meanwhile, the black line – that’s revenue – is barely budging. We’re looking at a gap that’s widening year after year, with no end in sight.

By 2054, we’re looking at spending levels above 30% of GDP with revenues hovering under 20%. This means we’ll be adding trillions to the national debt every single year, and that’s probably a best-case scenario. ~~ Lau Vegys, Doug Casey’s Crisis Investing

Lau Vegys, Doug Casey’s Crisis Investing

Today’s chart shows the path of U.S. government spending and revenues from 1989 to now, along with projections for the next 31 years.

See that gap between the lines? That’s where our debt comes from. Every year, when spending outpaces revenue, it’s like putting the difference on the national credit card.

Turn Your Images On

That was a recipe for a debt explosion, and that’s exactly what happened.

At writing, we’re staring at $35.67 trillion and counting in national debt, with interest payments exceeding $1 trillion for the first time in history.

Europe’s GDP has flatlined over the past 15 years, against a doubling in GDP for the U.S. and even bigger GDP gains in China.

While the U.S. leads the world in AI spending, and China leads in technology like drones, what does Europe lead the world in? Regulation.

They spend more time penalizing U.S. tech firms for regulatory violations than encouraging their own tech ecosystem.

Liquidity is flowing again, but conviction isn’t. U.S. M2 money supply has been expanding for months, even before the recent interest rate cut.

Currently, it’s up 4.8% year over year. That’s the fastest pace since 2022. That’s just enough to drive stocks higher in the short-term. Even algorithms and systematic funds will respond mechanically and buy stocks when they see liquidity rise. It’s the most fundamental indicator.

The volatility index (VIX)’s rise to 16.6, up over 2% this week, shows that big money is hedging, even as the market indices rise. After all, with signs of a slowing economy – and a government shut down – it’s hardly business as usual.

By then the receipts on my desk had arranged themselves into a sort of chorus. I heard, faintly, another refrain—one from Kentucky. In the first days of the shutdown, Senator Rand Paul stood alone among Republicans and voted against his party’s stopgap, telling interviewers that the numbers “don’t add up” and that he would not sign on to another year that piles $2 trillion onto the debt.

That, I realized, is what the tariff story shares with the broader budget theater: the habit of calling a tax something else, of shifting burdens into the fog and then celebrating the silhouette as victory. Even the vote tally made the point: he was the only Republican “no,” a lonely arithmetic lesson in a crowded room.

Senator Rand Paul, (R. KY), who was the sole Republican to vote against a continuing resolution, seems to care about the actual finances of the government. “I would never vote for a bill that added $2 trillion in national debt,” Paul said in various interviews over the weekend.

The $2 trillion he’s referring to is the lesser of two proposals made by the national parties… and would accrue during this next fiscal year.

Oy.

We liked what Liz Wolfe at Reason wrote on Friday, so we’ll repeat it here: “One of the dirty little secrets of every shutdown is that everything remains mostly fine. Private markets could easily replace many federal functions.”

It’s a strange kind of confidence — one where Wall Street soars while Washington goes dark.