GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

The Tenev Dilemma

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

January 30, 2025 • 3 minute, 30 second read


goldMain StreetPopulismWall Street

The Tenev Dilemma

“Once in a while you get shown the light… in the strangest of places if you look at it right.”

– Jerry Garcia


 

January 30, 2025 — And so it begins…

Three seemingly random ideas hitting our “inbox” at the same time — can’t be a coincidence. “Rabbit holes” don’t just appear on their own.

Yesterday, I had just wrapped up a brand-spanking-new Wiggin Session interview with Grey Swan Investment Fraternity Contributor Mark Jeftovic.

At the end, Mark Jeftovic was unpacking what he calls “hyperbitcoinization,” or the rapid increase and stabilization of digital assets in the global monetary system.

As I was digesting that, one of our researchers pointed to an op-ed in the Washington Post by Vlad Tenev.

To add to the intrigue, I had a report on my desk from Mike Huckabee, with whom we had a publishing relationship before President Trump appointed him as U.S. Ambassador to Israel.

On the cover, Huckabee summarized his analysis of Trump’s regulatory approach to Wall Street and the SEC thus: “Those on the right side of Trump’s investment policies will be millionaires. Those on the wrong side will be left behind.”

Et voila. Three ideas… no clear path.

So let’s make one.

Let’s begin with Tenev.

Vlad Tenev, the co-founder and CEO of Robinhood, argues that everyday investors are locked out of the best startup opportunities — companies like OpenAI and SpaceX — while the ultra-rich reap the rewards.

Meanwhile, retail investors are left playing in the high-risk sandbox of meme stocks, has-beens, and questionable IPOs.

Robinhood was supposed to be the great equalizer. Tenev and Baiju Bhatt launched the platform in 2013 with a promise: free and easy access to investing.

But in 2021, that promise came under fire when Robinhood restricted purchases of GameStop stock during its now-infamous short squeeze (other brokers did the same).

Many believed the move wasn’t about “protecting” investors but shielding hedge funds like Citadel Securities.

Tenev isn’t wrong about one thing: SEC regulations make it easier for the ultra-rich to access private markets while smaller investors get stuck with the lower-performing scraps.

But he fails to mention that Robinhood makes its money selling users’ trading data to Citadel, which then profits by front-running those trades.

In other words, when you put in a bid for Tesla Motors shares, you may pay a penny more as Citadel’s algorithms spoof some bids to drive up the price. A penny ain’t much, but do it a few billion times a day, and soon you’re talking real money.

That means that Robinhood, for all its populist branding, serves Wall Street’s biggest players first.

Now, the ground is shifting. The rise of digital assets and tokenization could finally open private markets to everyone from the ground up, not the bottom down.

Trump has made it clear in his second week in the White House that he’s pushing policies to accelerate blockchain-based investments, giving retail investors access to a playing field long dominated by insiders.

So, the real question isn’t whether the rules should change — they already are. It’s whether Tenev and companies like Robinhood will actually champion financial democratization or simply find new ways to funnel small investors into Wall Street’s favorite profit machine.

That’s the dilemma.

To solve it we need a good dose of Grey Swan methodology. As Gretzky said, we have to“skate to where the puck is going,” not sit on our arses and wait for the puck to come to us.

More to come as we connect the dots of populism (both political and financial)…

Regards,


Addison Wiggin,
Grey Swan

P.S. One of the places the financial puck is going is toward higher gold prices. The metal is close to hitting a new all-time dollar high of $2,800 per ounce. As promised, you can find our latest gold forecast here.

Fair warning: The headline number you see as a prediction for gold’s price has been dubbed “outrageous” by our publisher.

But after seeing our data, he’s also been pushing to get this info out as soon as possible. Take a look and judge for yourself. And let us know what you think: addison@greyswanfraternity.com


How To Guarantee Higher Prices

December 8, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

It’s absurd, really, for any politician to be talking about “affordability.”

The data is clear. If higher prices are your goal, let the government “fix” them.

Mandates, paperwork, and busybodies telling you what you can and can’t do – it’s not a surprise why costs add up.

In contrast, if you want lower prices, do nothing– zilch. Let the market work.

How To Guarantee Higher Prices
Gideon Ashwood: The Bondquake in Tokyo: Why Japan’s Shock Is Just the Beginning

December 5, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

For 30 years, Japan was the land where interest rates went to die.

The Bank of Japan used yield-curve control to keep long-term rates sedated. Traders joked that shorting Japanese bonds was the “widow-maker trade.”

Not anymore.

On November 20, 2025, everything changed. Quietly, but decisively.

The Bank of Japan finally pulled the plug on decades of easy money. Negative rates were removed. Yield-curve control was abandoned. The policy rate was lifted to a 17-year high.

Suddenly, global markets had to reprice something they had ignored for years.

What happens when the world’s largest creditor nation stops exporting cheap capital and starts pulling it back home?

The answer came fast. Bond yields in Europe and the United States began climbing. The Japanese yen strengthened sharply. Wall Street faltered.

Gideon Ashwood: The Bondquake in Tokyo: Why Japan’s Shock Is Just the Beginning
Minsky, the Fed, and the Fragile Good Cheer

December 5, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

The rate cut narrative is calcifying into gospel: the Fed must cut to save the consumer.

Bankrate reports that 59% of Americans cannot cover a $1,000 emergency without debt or selling something. And yet stocks are roaring, liquidity junkies are celebrating, and the top 10% now account for half of all consumer spending.

Here’s the plot twist: before 2020, consumer confidence faithfully tracked equity markets. After 2020, that relationship broke. As one analyst put it, “The poor don’t hate stocks going up. They just don’t feel it anymore.”

So when the Fed cuts rates in one of the hottest stock markets in history, who exactly benefits? Not the 59%. Not the middle. Certainly not anyone renting and watching shelter inflation devour their paycheck.

Minsky, the Fed, and the Fragile Good Cheer
The Unsinkable S&P

December 5, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Only the late-stage dot-com fever dreams did better in recent memory — back when analysts were valuing companies by the number of mammals breathing inside the office.

For the moment, stocks appear unsinkable, unslappable, and perhaps uninsurable. But this is what generational technology shifts do: they take a kernel of genuine innovation and inflate a decade of growth into a 36-month highlight reel. We’ve seen this movie. It premiered in 1999 and closed with adults crying into their PalmPilots.

And just as the internet continued reshaping the world long after Pets.com curled up and died, AI will keep marching on whether or not today’s multiples survive a stiff breeze. The technology is real. The valuations, however, will eventually need to stop hyperventilating and sit down with a glass of water.

The Unsinkable S&P