GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Daily Missive

The Tenev Dilemma

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

January 30, 2025 • 3 minute, 30 second read


goldMain StreetPopulismWall Street

The Tenev Dilemma

“Once in a while you get shown the light… in the strangest of places if you look at it right.”

– Jerry Garcia


 

January 30, 2025 — And so it begins…

Three seemingly random ideas hitting our “inbox” at the same time — can’t be a coincidence. “Rabbit holes” don’t just appear on their own.

Yesterday, I had just wrapped up a brand-spanking-new Wiggin Session interview with Grey Swan Investment Fraternity Contributor Mark Jeftovic.

At the end, Mark Jeftovic was unpacking what he calls “hyperbitcoinization,” or the rapid increase and stabilization of digital assets in the global monetary system.

As I was digesting that, one of our researchers pointed to an op-ed in the Washington Post by Vlad Tenev.

To add to the intrigue, I had a report on my desk from Mike Huckabee, with whom we had a publishing relationship before President Trump appointed him as U.S. Ambassador to Israel.

On the cover, Huckabee summarized his analysis of Trump’s regulatory approach to Wall Street and the SEC thus: “Those on the right side of Trump’s investment policies will be millionaires. Those on the wrong side will be left behind.”

Et voila. Three ideas… no clear path.

So let’s make one.

Let’s begin with Tenev.

Vlad Tenev, the co-founder and CEO of Robinhood, argues that everyday investors are locked out of the best startup opportunities — companies like OpenAI and SpaceX — while the ultra-rich reap the rewards.

Meanwhile, retail investors are left playing in the high-risk sandbox of meme stocks, has-beens, and questionable IPOs.

Robinhood was supposed to be the great equalizer. Tenev and Baiju Bhatt launched the platform in 2013 with a promise: free and easy access to investing.

But in 2021, that promise came under fire when Robinhood restricted purchases of GameStop stock during its now-infamous short squeeze (other brokers did the same).

Many believed the move wasn’t about “protecting” investors but shielding hedge funds like Citadel Securities.

Tenev isn’t wrong about one thing: SEC regulations make it easier for the ultra-rich to access private markets while smaller investors get stuck with the lower-performing scraps.

But he fails to mention that Robinhood makes its money selling users’ trading data to Citadel, which then profits by front-running those trades.

In other words, when you put in a bid for Tesla Motors shares, you may pay a penny more as Citadel’s algorithms spoof some bids to drive up the price. A penny ain’t much, but do it a few billion times a day, and soon you’re talking real money.

That means that Robinhood, for all its populist branding, serves Wall Street’s biggest players first.

Now, the ground is shifting. The rise of digital assets and tokenization could finally open private markets to everyone from the ground up, not the bottom down.

Trump has made it clear in his second week in the White House that he’s pushing policies to accelerate blockchain-based investments, giving retail investors access to a playing field long dominated by insiders.

So, the real question isn’t whether the rules should change — they already are. It’s whether Tenev and companies like Robinhood will actually champion financial democratization or simply find new ways to funnel small investors into Wall Street’s favorite profit machine.

That’s the dilemma.

To solve it we need a good dose of Grey Swan methodology. As Gretzky said, we have to“skate to where the puck is going,” not sit on our arses and wait for the puck to come to us.

More to come as we connect the dots of populism (both political and financial)…

Regards,


Addison Wiggin,
Grey Swan

P.S. One of the places the financial puck is going is toward higher gold prices. The metal is close to hitting a new all-time dollar high of $2,800 per ounce. As promised, you can find our latest gold forecast here.

Fair warning: The headline number you see as a prediction for gold’s price has been dubbed “outrageous” by our publisher.

But after seeing our data, he’s also been pushing to get this info out as soon as possible. Take a look and judge for yourself. And let us know what you think: addison@greyswanfraternity.com


Gold’s $4,000 Moment

October 8, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

There’s something about big, round numbers that draws investors like moths to a flame.

In the stock market, every 1,000 points in the Dow or 100 points in the S&P 500 tends to act like a magnet.

Now, after consolidating for five months, gold has broken higher to $4,000.

Gold’s $4,000 Moment
The 45% Club

October 8, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

AI stocks are running hot. They’re not the only game in town… but they’re about half of it.

JPMorgan just reviewed all of the 500 companies in the S&P 500. A full 41 of them are AI-related. While that’s less than 10% of the index by total, it is over 45% of the index by market cap.

The 45% Club
George Gilder: Morgan Stanley’s Memory Problem

October 7, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Overspending during periods of rising ASPs is self-destructive. For most products, today’s ASP increases result less from natural demand pull and more from supplier-enforced discipline. If memory makers treat them as justification for a capex binge, they will repeat past mistakes and trigger another collapse.

The $50 billion bull case for WFE in 2026 rests on a faulty assumption. Lam and AMAT may benefit from selective investments, but the cycle-defining upturn Morgan Stanley describes is unlikely.

Investors should temper expectations. If history repeats — and memory markets have a way of doing so — the companies that preserve pricing power will outperform, while equipment suppliers may find that the promised order boom never fully materializes.

George Gilder: Morgan Stanley’s Memory Problem
Europe’s Increasing Irrelevancy

October 7, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Europe’s GDP has flatlined over the past 15 years, against a doubling in GDP for the U.S. and even bigger GDP gains in China.

While the U.S. leads the world in AI spending, and China leads in technology like drones, what does Europe lead the world in? Regulation.

They spend more time penalizing U.S. tech firms for regulatory violations than encouraging their own tech ecosystem.

Europe’s Increasing Irrelevancy