Daily Missive

The Tariff Chaos Is Settling In

Loading ...Bill Bonner

April 8, 20257 minute, 56 second read



The Tariff Chaos Is Settling In

“When I was growing up, my parents told me, ‘Finish your dinner. People in China and India are starving.’ I tell my daughters, ‘Finish your homework. People in India and China are starving for your job.’”

–Thomas Friedman

 

April 8, 2025 – Tariffs, tariffs everywhere…

What a rollicking good time for the press. And for Trump critics. The wires:

Stocks slide around the world as investors recoil from Trump’s tariffs

We watched the tape Thursday. The Dow was down 1,000…then 1,200…then 1,500. Where would it come to rest, we wondered. It ended the day down 1,679.

In his first term, Trump committed one of the biggest blunders in U.S. economic history — shutting down the economy and replacing real output with an extra $4 trillion in phony, printed-up stimmy checks.

The result? The worst inflation in fifty years.

And now…here comes Big Blunder No. 2. Doubters overseas and skeptics at home — all are having a field day. Raw Story:

“This might be the single stupidest thing any of us will ever see,” [Ian] Dunt argued. “It is stupid in every way: presentationally, intellectually, politically, methodologically, morally and of course economically. The word stupid doesn’t really suffice for the full level of idiocy we’ve now reached.”

Trump’s tariffs are so dumb they are uniting Democrats and Republicans… free traders and protectionists…comedians and historians. Alternet:

Shortly after President Donald Trump issued Wednesday’s announcement of new tariffs, four Senate Republicans joined Democrats to extend a lopsided bipartisan rebuke to his trade policy. The Senate adopted a resolution by a 51 to 48 vote to block his proposed tariffs on imports from Canada, a longtime U.S. ally. Now, former Vice President Mike Pence is further infuriating Trump supporters by calling out his new tariffs as “a tax.”

The tariffs are even making economists look smart. Finally, here is something that Paul Krugman — famously wrong about most everything — can be right about. Raw Story:

“Based on what he said, he’s gone full-on crazy,” wrote Krugman, a frequent critic of the president. “It’s not just that he appears to be imposing much higher tariffs than almost anyone expected. He’s also making false claims about our trading partners — not sure in this case whether they’re lies, because he may be truly ignorant — that will both enrage them and make it very hard to back down. Basically, he’s claiming that the rest of the world is placing very high tariffs on U.S. products, and that he’s imposing ‘reciprocal’ tariffs that are only half what they impose on us.”

“The EU, like the United States, has generally low tariffs; the average tariff it charges on U.S. goods is less than 3 percent,” wrote Krugman. “So where does this 39 percent number come from? I have no idea. Many people speculated that Trump would count value-added taxes as tariffs, even though they aren’t — European producers selling to the EU market pay the same VAT as U.S. producers, so it doesn’t discriminate and therefore isn’t protectionist. But even if you get that wrong, EU VAT rates are in the vicinity of 20 percent, so you still can’t get anywhere close to 39 percent.”

Where do Trump’s numbers come from? Some are nonsense. Some are irrelevant. Some are pure WTF. The Donald, for example, says Taiwan should get a 64% tariff.

On a total of $134 billion of back-and-forth trade in 2023, tariffs on imports and exports averaged 2% — even Steven, coming and going. So, why a penalty tariff on our supposed ally?

Trump:

“We are going to charge countries for doing business in our country and taking our jobs, taking our wealth, taking a lot of things that they have been taking over the years.”

Business Insider:

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Wednesday that President Donald Trump’s new reciprocal tariffs are just a response to how the U.S. has been treated on trade.

Laura Ingraham at Fox picks up the fight club angle. “Only Trump has the guts” to stop the foreigners from ripping us off, she says.

Get it? They’re Honor Tariffs… like honor killings, designed to reclaim America’s sense of fairness…justice…and honor. We’re going to teach them a lesson by imposing taxes – on ourselves!

Because, the foreigners don’t pay the tariff penalties. U.S. consumers do.

Warren Buffett explains:

“The Tooth Fairy doesn’t pay ’em!”

And why are the feds getting involved at all?

Donald Trump is the ultimate politician…always fighting for power, prestige, and money. That’s why he insists upon being a ‘winner.’ In politics, you are either a winner or a victim. Now, he thinks he can win by bludgeoning other nations with tariffs.

But trade is not meant to be part of the political world. It’s part of the win-win world of commerce — bargaining, negotiating, and trying to satisfy a customer.

When an honest trade happens, both sides win. Each gets something he didn’t have before and gives up something he considers less valuable. Bringing in politics just queers the deal.

And now that the politicians are on the case, you can expect them to make the same sort of mess of it that they made of Amtrak, Iraq, and the Covid hysteria. Expect lower growth, higher prices, and more chaos.

Regards,

Bill Bonner

Bonner Private Research & Grey Swan

P.S. from Addison: “These were peaceful protests, not crazy mobs,” writes Kim K. (not the reality star), headlining a series of reader responses that adroitly express confusion over both the tariffs and the “Hands Off!” protests over the weekend. 

“The protestors were peacefully practicing our democratic right to peacefully gather and protest. When this right ends, so does our democracy.”

Indeed. 

The signs we featured advocate the guillotine for Trump and Musk. Historically speaking, that didn’t work out so well for the folks who advocated a similar solution in 1789 in France. 

“In your article,” Carl N. writes, “you say ‘mobs excel at being against something.’ This brought to mind a comment by Eric Hoffer in his book The True Believer:

Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all the unifying agents. Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a god, but never without a belief in a devil.”

“The chaos is self-inflicted,” our friend Scott P. begins with a familiar criticism following a subject line that is curiously titled Your Drumbeat For War: 

Every society that allows wealth and power to concentrate collapses — interestingly, that’s every society with a government. As Ben Franklin forewarned: ‘A republic if you can keep it.’ Keeping it requires the people to diligently focus on leveling the playing field — a naive fantasy.

So, we have wealth and power concentrated to destructive levels. The left says, ‘It should be steady as she goes,’ realizing a select few benefits immensely. The right says, ‘Let’s concentrate wealth and power more,’ and installs the current clown show. The right is expecting that their billionaire champions will be the first men in human history to forego their wealth and power for the benefit of the masses. 

Don’t hold your breath.

We’ll never solve the problem until we identify it.

The left blames the right (a great diversion). The right blames immigrants, the poor, minorities, women, foreigners, and the left (an even more significant diversion to amplify outrage). Surprisingly, no one looks at the well-heeled elites—the ones controlling all that wealth and power. 

Curious.

The Republicans and Democrats had a tacit agreement to share the spoils regardless of who was in charge. The king has now changed the agreement. All players must now grovel and pay tribute to the crown. 

Then Mr. P ends with this familiar barb: “You are on the deck of a sinking ship, crafting witty banter. We’ll see how long you stay afloat.” 

Curious indeed. Pretty sure the last line is ad hominem… apparently, we are the problem. 

And also… going back to “shock and awe” – the preemptive invasion of Iraq by a coalition of the willing – around the time we began this crazy idea of offering opinions professionally, we’ve never advocated for war. 

“Addison,” writes Richard S., further expressing confusion, “My question to President Trump is, what’s the grand plan? Lay it out for We The People. So we know whatever sacrifices we need to make, the sun will be shining on the other side. If the plan is like what President Milei laid out for Argentina, it worked.”

Richard, we took our best shot at explaining The Trump Master Plan right here.

There are more emails in the box. Send yours to: addison@greyswanfraternity.com. We read them all. 

P.P.S.:  If you’re a paid-up member of the Grey Swan Investment Fraternity, please join us for a live Zoom call on Thursday at 11 a.m. April, 10 EST. 

This week, we’ll take a deeper dive into our model portfolio and how those positions have fared during the global sell-off. (Quick spoiler alert: 15 of 20 positions are up, including all five of our Aggressive Portfolio positions.)

Fraternity members will get the link and password on Thursday morning. Seats are limited. Risk isn’t.

We’re also asking for your best trading ideas. You read that right: we’re throwing the gates wide open and “crowd-sourcing” new trades with you! Bring ‘em on… no ideas are too small.

If you have any suggestions on  new trades or macro ideas we’re missing, please share them here: addison@greyswanfraternity.com


DASH and LOW Stock Have One Key Thing In Common

September 18, 2025Adam O'Dell

Sometimes, a compelling market trend flashes like a neon sign on the Vegas strip.

We’ve seen that a lot with mega trends like artificial intelligence (AI) over the last few years. Just last week, Oracle was rewarded with a 40% post-earnings pop in its stock price after a strong earnings outlook for its AI cloud business.

Other times, you’ve got to do a little work to find out what’s driving a stock’s price higher. And my “New Bulls” list each week is a great place to start.

DASH and LOW Stock Have One Key Thing In Common
The Carrot and The Stick

September 18, 2025Addison Wiggin

Incentives grow markets. Regulation stunts their fragile bones.

The Fed’s rate cuts are carrots. Markets are feasting on them. Over in the Grey Swan Trading Fraternity, Portfolio Director Andrew Packer added a long trade in the commodity market – in a small-cap player, producing a commodity domestically.

As a cherry on top, it might be the next MP Materials or Intel and get explicit government backing, which could really cause shares to take off.

Trump’s threats to the Fed, or the FCC’s jawboning of broadcasters, are sticks. Investors must decide which matters more.

As one market veteran told The Wall Street Journal: “Cheaper money is a carrot. But the bigger question is whether trust in our institutions can hold. Without that, the carrots won’t matter.”

The Carrot and The Stick
Nasdaq Enters Nosebleed Heights

September 18, 2025Addison Wiggin

If you follow technical indicators, the Nasdaq — a broad measure of tech stocks — is now “extremely overbought”… a level only seen in 0.4% of its history.

That’s less than half a percent, and it is likely the precursor to a correction when traders decide to take profits.

Our advice, “panic now, avoid the rush” and rotate your tech into hard assets such as gold , bitcoin, and commodities in general.

Nasdaq Enters Nosebleed Heights
Stefan Bartl: From Draining the Swamp to Owning Intel: Is the Right Becoming What It Feared?

September 17, 2025Addison Wiggin

As time unfolds, the US federal government’s tentacles burrow ever-deeper into the economy. In the 2008 crisis, banks deemed “too big to fail” received a government bailout. The following year, automobile firms GM and Chrysler were saved from bankruptcy. When the Treasury exited GM in 2013, taxpayers were left with a loss of more than $10 billion. Ten years later, the federal government forbade Nippon Steel to acquire US Steel, in a merger they both desired. Instead, the government settled for Nippon Steel to invest in US Steel alongside its own direct ownership of the firm via a “golden share.” Just this past week, the US federal government announced its 10 percent stake in Intel, the struggling US semiconductor giant. On top of the $7 billion Intel had already received from the 2024 CHIPS Act, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo called Intel “America’s champion semiconductor company.”

Stefan Bartl: From Draining the Swamp to Owning Intel: Is the Right Becoming What It Feared?