Spear Phishing, Drone War and The Election

“War is the continuation of politics by other means.”

–Carl von Clausewitz

We were preparing to release our latest interview with Grey Swan contributor John Robb, when a few news items crossed the transom.

Over the weekend, the Trump campaign announced that “foreign sources hostile to the United States” had accessed some private communications and documents from its network using AI modules.

A Microsoft report corroborated, announcing hacker groups connected with the Iranian government “sent a ‘spear phishing’ email in June to a high-ranking official on a presidential campaign.” The report continues:

They’ve laid the groundwork for influence campaigns on trending election-related topics and begun to activate these campaigns in an apparent effort to stir up controversy or sway voters—especially in swing states. [And] launched operations that Microsoft assesses are designed to gain intelligence on political campaigns and help enable them to influence the elections in the future.

Microsoft added that an Iranian group has been launching covert news sites targeting US voter groups on opposing ends of the political spectrum:

One of the sites, called Nio Thinker, caters to left-leaning audiences and insults former president Donald Trump, calling him an “opioid-pilled elephant in the MAGA china shop” and a “raving mad litigiosaur.”

Another, called Savannah Time, claims to be a “trusted source for conservative news in the vibrant city of Savannah” and focuses on topics including LGBTQ+ issues and gender reassignment. The evidence we found suggests the sites are using AI-enabled services to plagiarize at least some of their content from US publications.

The cynic presumes the worst.

In our “wag the dog” scenario, we immediately suspected the “news” had been pounced on by the Trump campaign because the “honeymoon” period of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz trying to rally the Democratic base was stealing headlines from their own post-assassination-attempt, Republican National Convention, and JD Vance announcement buzz.

Either way, another news report from the Associated Press indicates, “U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has ordered a guided missile submarine to the Middle East and is telling the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group to sail more quickly to the area, the Defense Department said Sunday.”

As we track government spending, the national debt cresting $35 trillion, and the real motives for conflict in Ukraine, Israel and all across the Middle East, the motives for various details get murky.

“We’re in a networked world,” we’ve only recently noted to Mr. Robb. “Can the U.S. even win a forever war? Or is it just perpetually expensive.”

His response was not very encouraging. John Robb:

The US has been trying to manage the global situation for quite a while and has been doing a relatively bad job of it.

Top-line governments and nation-building stuff tend to backfire and haven’t yielded the results that we wanted. But now we see something relatively more dangerous. We’re already on an almost inevitable course towards conflict with China and Russia and most of Asia.

During the buildup, China has been producing a lot of drones.

They have the capacity to produce millions per month. And right out of the starting gates and they could use those drones to supply groups like the Houthis that are hard to attack because they are relatively remote.

Yet, the Houthis can use those drones or any group like that could use those drones to erect aerial denial blockades of sea air and land upwards of 500 to a thousand miles distant from their location.

Seems like a minor detail, but moving a submarine into the Mediterranean capable of launching long-range cruise missiles is an escalation – during a critical election already besieged with AI-induced “misinformation”… well, it’s caught our attention.

We’ll reveal more of our wide-ranging discussion with John tomorrow. His insights into “netwar” are alarming, at best.

So it goes,

Addison Wiggin,

Grey Swan

P.S. While watching JD Vance speak on C.B.S.’ Face the Nation this weekend, we came up with this suggestion for the Republican strategists: One up Harris and Walz by having Trump drop out of the race and grab all the headlines during the Democratic National Convention.

Trump has already remade the RNC in his image. They’d just need to throw in a new VP candidate and a couple aggressive debates. Vance is far more articulate about policy than either Trump or Harris.

Heh. Thoughts? Send them here: addison@greyswanfraternity.com

“War is the continuation of politics by other means.”

–Carl von Clausewitz

We were preparing to release our latest interview with Grey Swan contributor John Robb, when a few news items crossed the transom.

Over the weekend, the Trump campaign announced that “foreign sources hostile to the United States” had accessed some private communications and documents from its network using AI modules.

They’ve laid the groundwork for influence campaigns on trending election-related topics and begun to activate these campaigns in an apparent effort to stir up controversy or sway voters—especially in swing states. [And] launched operations that Microsoft assesses are designed to gain intelligence on political campaigns and help enable them to influence the elections in the future.

Microsoft added that an Iranian group has been launching covert news sites targeting US voter groups on opposing ends of the political spectrum:

The cynic presumes the worst.

“We’re in a networked world,” we’ve only recently noted to Mr. Robb. “Can the U.S. even win a forever war? Or is it just perpetually expensive.”

His response was not very encouraging. John Robb:

The US has been trying to manage the global situation for quite a while and has been doing a relatively bad job of it.

Top-line governments and nation-building stuff tend to backfire and haven’t yielded the results that we wanted. But now we see something relatively more dangerous. We’re already on an almost inevitable course towards conflict with China and Russia and most of Asia.

During the buildup, China has been producing a lot of drones.

They have the capacity to produce millions per month. And right out of the starting gates and they could use those drones to supply groups like the Houthis that are hard to attack because they are relatively remote.

Yet, the Houthis can use those drones or any group like that could use those drones to erect aerial denial blockades of sea air and land upwards of 500 to a thousand miles distant from their location.

We’ll reveal more of our wide-ranging discussion with John tomorrow. His insights into “netwar” are alarming, at best.

So it goes,

Addison Wiggin,

Grey Swan

Heh. Thoughts? Send them here: addison@greyswanfraternity.com

Trump and Powell are no buddies. They’ve been fighting over rate cuts all year—Trump demanding more, Powell holding back. Even after cutting twice, Trump called him “grossly incompetent” and said he’d “love to fire” him. The tension has been building for months.

And Trump now seems ready to install someone who shares his appetite for lower rates and easier money.

Trump has been dropping hints for weeks—saying on November 18, “I think I already know my choice,” and then doubling down last Sunday aboard Air Force One with, “I know who I am going to pick… we’ll be announcing it.”

He was referring to one Kevin Hassett, who—according to a recent Bloomberg report—has emerged as the overwhelming favorite to become the next Fed chair.

Here we sit — investors, analysts, retirees, accountants, even a few masochistic economists — gathered beneath the leafless monetary tree, rehearsing our lines as we wait for Jerome Powell to step onstage and tell us what the future means.

Spoiler: he can’t. But that does not stop us from waiting.

Tomorrow, he is expected to deliver the December rate cut. Polymarket odds sit at 96% for a dainty 25-point cut.

Trump, Navarro and Lutnick pine for 50 points.

And somewhere in the wings smiles Kevin Hassett — at 74% odds this morning, the presumed Powell successor — watching the last few snowflakes fall before his cue arrives.

With U.S. stocks trading at about 24 times forward earnings, plans for capital growth have to go off without a hitch. Given the billions of dollars in commitments by AI companies, financing to the hilt on debt, the most realistic outcome is a hitch.

On a valuation basis, global markets will likely show better returns than U.S. stocks in 2026.

America leads the world in innovation. A U.S. tech stock will naturally fetch a higher price than, say, a German brewery. But value matters, too.

As copper flowed into the United States, LME inventories thinned and backwardation steepened. Higher U.S. pricing, tariff protection, and lower political risk made American warehouses the most attractive destination for metal. Each new shipment strengthened the spread.

The arbitrage, once triggered, became self-reinforcing. Traders were not participating in theory; they were responding to the physical incentives in front of them.

The United States had quietly become the marginal buyer of the world’s most important industrial metal. China, long the gravitational center of global copper demand, found itself on the outside.