GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

Matt Milner: Now You Can Buy SpaceX — Should You?

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

July 10, 2025 • 4 minute, 22 second read


CrowdabilityPre-IPOSpace X

Matt Milner: Now You Can Buy SpaceX — Should You?

Now You Can Buy SpaceX — Should You?

“The great lesson in microeconomics is to discriminate between when technology is going to help you and when it’s going to kill you.”

~ Charlie Munger

July 10, 2025 — Earlier this month, something extraordinary happened:

Ordinary investors like you and me were offered the chance to buy “shares” in some of the fastest-growing private companies on Earth.

I’m talking about pre-IPO companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, even SpaceX.

But there’s a catch.

These aren’t actual shares. They’re something called tokens.

What’s going on here? Is this a breakthrough — or the next bubble?
Let’s unpack it.

Here’s What Just Happened

Two major investment platforms made headlines last week:

  • Robinhood started offering investors “tokenized shares” of OpenAI and SpaceX.
  • Republic launched a new offering called “Mirror Tokens” that are tied to four major startups: OpenAI, Anthropic, Epic Games, and SpaceX.

The pitch? These tokens give regular investors exposure to high-flying, pre-IPO companies—starting with as little as $50.

How It Actually Works

This isn’t like buying shares of Apple or Tesla in the stock market.

Instead, these platforms are using a concept called tokenization:

They take private shares, or derivatives tied to the private shares, and wrap them in a “token” that lives on the blockchain. (A blockchain is a digital ledger that records transactions in a secure, transparent way. It’s like a spreadsheet that everyone can see, but no one can change.)

So you’re not buying actual equity in OpenAI or SpaceX. Instead, you’re buying a digital token that’s meant to track the performance of that equity.

In Robinhood’s case, these tokens are available only to non-U.S. customers. In Republic’s case, the token sales are relying on SEC rules created by the JOBS Act — the regulations that have started opening up private investing to ordinary investors.

Tokenization is innovative. It’s clever.

But it also raises a lot of questions.

Continued Below…

[Urgent] Starlink Set For The Largest IPO In History?

He turned PayPal from a tiny, off-the-radar startup… to a massive $64 billion giant.

Then, he did it again with Tesla… which is up more than 19,500% since 2010.

For perspective, that turns $100 invested into almost $20,000!

And now, Elon could be set to do it for the third and final time… with what might be his biggest breakthrough yet.

And for the first time ever, you have the rare chance to profit BEFORE the upcoming IPO.

Click here now for the urgent details on this hidden play.

The Risks

Here are four risks you need to understand about tokenization.

1. You Might Not Own What You Think

Sam Altman, the founder of CEO of OpenAI, said OpenAI didn’t authorize the sale of these tokens, and reminded the public that actual equity transfers require company approval. In fact, OpenAI publicly disavowed Robinhood’s offering. Translation? These tokens might not be backed by enforceable ownership rights.

2. Regulatory Loopholes Are Being Exploited

Robinhood and Republic are threading the needle of U.S. securities law by targeting non-U.S. customers, or by using exemptions found in the JOBS Act. These strategies may be legal — but they also sidestep investor protections designed to keep retail investors safe.

3. Liquidity Isn’t Guaranteed

Despite being built on the blockchain, these tokens can only be traded on pre-approved digital “wallets,” on limited exchanges, or on exchanges that are planned for the future, but don’t yet exist. This is a far cry from truly liquid markets. In other words, don’t invest any capital here that you might need for your rent, mortgage, or groceries.

4. Lack of Transparency

The mechanics of pricing the tokens aren’t clear. Without this transparency, how will you know what your tokens are actually worth?

Many investment platforms are steering clear. For example, as Public’s co-CEO Leif Abraham put it, “We decided not to offer tokenized startup shares because of the risk and ambiguity for retail investors.”

Why It Still Matters

Despite the risks and ambiguity, the demand is obvious — and growing:

  • Individual investors are hungry for access to elite startups.As we explained last week, ordinary investors are starting to understand that there’s been a major shift: the biggest returns are now found in the private markets.
  • The JOBS Act helps. These new regulations enable any investor, regardless of income or net worth, to invest in a large universe of private startups. But getting access to the fastest-growing pre-IPO companies — like OpenAI or SpaceX — is still gated by wealth, access, and accreditation laws.
  • Tokenization could finally open up these markets to the masses.

Even if the first generation of these products is imperfect, the underlying trend is real.

It’s likely that regulators, institutions, and tech platforms will eventually find a middle ground — one that preserves investor protections while succeeding in broadening access.

The Bottom Line

This new wave of tokenized shares is exciting. It has the potential to break down walls and democratize access to pre-IPO giants.

But at the moment, it’s also risky, opaque, and largely unregulated.

So while we applaud the innovation, we urge caution — especially if you’re being offered something that seems too good to be true.

Best Regards,

Turn Your Images On

Founder Crowdability.com and Grey Swan


Grey Swan Forecast #6: China Annexes Taiwan — Without a Shot Fired

December 26, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Our forecast will feel obvious in hindsight and controversial in advance — the hallmark of a Grey Swan.

Most analysts we speak to are thinking in terms of the history of Western conflict. 

They expect full-frontal military engagement.

Beijing, from our modest perch, prefers resolution because resolution compounds its power. Why sacrifice the workshop of the world, when cajoling and bribery will do?

Taiwan will not fall.

It will merge.

Grey Swan Forecast #6: China Annexes Taiwan — Without a Shot Fired
Grey Swan Forecast #7: A Global Debt Crisis Will Reprice Democracy

December 24, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Wars, technology races, and political upheavals — all of them rest on fiscal capacity.

In 2026, that capacity will tighten across the developed world simultaneously. Democracies will discover that generosity financed by debt carries conditions, whether voters approve of them or not.

Bond markets will not shout so much as clear their throats. Repeatedly.

Grey Swan Forecast #7: A Global Debt Crisis Will Reprice Democracy
Seven Grey Swans, One Year Later

December 23, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Taken together, the seven Grey Swans of 2025 behaved less like isolated events and more like interlocking stories readers already recognize.

The year moved in phases. A sharp April selloff cleared leverage quickly. Policy shifted toward tax relief, lighter regulation, and renewed tolerance for liquidity. Innovations began to slowly dominate the marketplace conversation – from Dollar 2.0 digital assets to AI-powered applications in all manner of commercial enterprises, ranging from airline and hotel bookings to driverless taxis and robots. 

Seven Grey Swans, One Year Later
2025: The Lens We Used — Fire, Transition, and What’s Next… The Boom!

December 22, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Back in April, when we published what we called the Trump Great Reset Strategy, we described the grand realignment we believed President Trump and his acolytes were embarking on in three phases.

At the time, it read like a conceptual map. As the months passed, it began to feel like a set of operating instructions written in advance of turbulence.

As you can expect, any grandiose plan would get all kinds of blowback… but this year exhibited all manner of Trump Derangement Syndrome on top of the difficulty of steering a sclerotic empire clear of the rocky shores.

The “phases” were never about optimism or pessimism. They were about sequencing — how stress surfaces, how systems adapt, and what must hold before confidence can regenerate. And in the end, what do we do with our money?!

2025: The Lens We Used — Fire, Transition, and What’s Next… The Boom!