GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

Lose-Lose Deals

Loading ...Bill Bonner

February 3, 2025 • 4 minute, 17 second read


Trade war

Lose-Lose Deals

 

The idea of punishing trade is silly; specialization is the sine qua non of prosperity. One man grows tomatoes so another can focus on corn. One takes advantage of long summers to welcome tourists.

 

Monday, February 3rd, 2025

 

Bill Bonner, writing from Baltimore, Maryland

 

 

Investors sat on the edge of their chairs on Friday. Trump said he was going to impose tariffs on Mexico and Canada. Both countries promised to retaliate. The madness of it was just beginning to become clear.

There are win-win deals. There are win-lose deals. And there are lose-lose deals. Mr. Trump has found one — a deal so bad that a poll of ‘39 of the nation’s leading economists’ found not a single one who approved of it. The Wall Street Journal called it ‘the dumbest trade war in history.’

Imagine a town that tries to protect itself from competitors. Rather than freely trade with the shoe shop in a nearby-town, it demands a pay-off; ‘if we buy your shoes,’ it says to the owner, ‘you’ll have to pay us a 25% tariff.’ It makes the same proposition to the car dealer in the next town over… and with the newspaper in the state capital.

What do you think? Does this town get rich… or does it become a joke?

The idea of punishing trade is silly; specialization is the sine qua non of prosperity. One man grows tomatoes so another can focus on corn. One takes advantage of his long summers to welcome tourists… another drills for oil in the chilly north.

But you can only benefit from specialization if you can trade. Trade with neighbors. Trade with different states. Trade with people in foreign countries. That is why real money was such a breakthough; it allowed people to trade, easily, with people they didn’t know and didn’t trust.

A fool might be able to make a pair of clumsy shoes for himself in a day’s worth of labor. The shoemaker, spending an entire career at it, can make more shoes… and better ones. Then, the world is a richer place; it has more shoes! Those who don’t participate go barefoot.

This is not a controversial idea. Everybody knows that at the very least, tariffs will raise prices and make Americans poorer. They will be stuck with inferior products at high prices made by bad industries with good lobbyists. That’s already happening in the auto sector.

In this regard, Trump is merely following the Biden administration, which imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese-made electric cars. Even with a 100% tariff, the Biden bunch worried that the cars might still be attractive to US consumers… so they added more restrictions, effectively banning the lower priced/higher quality cars from the US market. Now, Americans pay twice as much for a similar car.

Team Biden argued that China’s cars should be kept out for ‘national security’ reasons. The Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 apparently gave him the authority. But where’s the ‘emergency’ on the steppes of Saskatchewan? Where’s the national security risk in Ottawa?

And now, all over the world, people are wondering. Being an enemy of the US empire is dangerous. But being a friend is not much better. Trump is threatening to take Greenland from our Danish allies…and the Panama Canal from our Central American friends.

Friends and enemies alike are now looking for alternatives to US consumers, US products and the US dollar. All have been politicized. Like tourists outfitted with explosive vests, who wants them?

In December the EU inked ‘the largest trade deal in history’ with the Mercosur nations of South America. Thailand did a deal with several European nations. Brussels is negotiating with Malaysia. China has done nine new trade deals since 2017. Even India, normally reluctant to enter trade agreements, is now in talks with the EU.

Only in the Americas does the US still dominate trade. And now, that is in jeopardy, too.

On Friday morning, investors wondered if the president would really do such an imbecilic thing. Maybe it was a negotiating tactic, they asked. But negotiating for what? Nobody seemed to know. Did he really expect foreign nations to solve Americans’ drug addictions…or secure its borders?

Then, when the White House revealed that it was serious about imposing tariffs on long-time friends, stocks sold off. The headlines this morning tell us that Wall Street is ‘bracing’ for more… but who knows?

What we do know is that with so much chaos and uncertainty sweeping the world, investors are looking for safety. Gold glitters, says Dan. The price per ounce went over $2,850 last week.

Cryptopolitan:

Gold makes new all-time high as Trump’s actions weaken the US dollar

The Canadian dollar and Mexican peso tumbled almost instantly while the Oval [office] interview was still going on. US Treasury yields pulled back immediately, and West Texas Intermediate oil futures jumped to $73 a barrel.

Peter Cardillo, a market economist, is betting gold will hit $3,000 an ounce soon. “We see the potential for much higher prices,” he said.

More on gold… tomorrow…

Until then,

Bill Bonner


Dan Amoss: Squanderville Is Running Out Of Quick Fixes

December 19, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Relative to GDP, the net international investment claim on the U.S. economy was 20% in 2003. It had swollen to 65% by 2023. Practically every type of American company, bond, or real estate asset now has some degree of foreign ownership.

But it’s even worse than that. As the federal deficit has pumped up the GDP figures, and made a larger share of the economy dependent on government spending, the quality and sustainability of GDP have deteriorated. So, foreigners, to the extent they are paying attention, are accumulating claims on an economy that has been eroded by inefficient, government-directed spending and “investments.” Why should foreign creditors maintain confidence in the integrity of these paper claims? Only to the extent that their economies are even worse off. And in the case of China, that’s probably true.

Dan Amoss: Squanderville Is Running Out Of Quick Fixes
Debt Is the Message, 2026

December 19, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

As global government interest expense climbed, gold quietly followed it higher. The IIF estimates that interest costs on government debt now run at nearly $4.9 trillion annually. Over the same span, gold prices have tracked that burden almost one-for-one.

Silver has recently gone along for the ride, with even more enthusiasm.

Since early 2023, Japan’s 10-year government bond yield has risen roughly 150 basis points, touching levels not seen since the 1990s.

Over that same period, gold prices have surged about 135%, while silver is up roughly 175%. Zoom out two years, and the divergence becomes starker still: gold up 114%, silver up 178%, while the S&P 500 gained 44%.

Debt Is the Message, 2026
Mind Your Allocation In 2026

December 19, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

According to the American Association of Individual Investors, the average retail investor has about a 70% allocation to stocks. That’s well over the traditional 60/40 split between stocks and bonds. Even a 60/40 allocation ignores real estate, gold, collectibles, and private assets.

A pullback in the 10% range – which is likely in any given year – will prompt investors to scream as if it’s the end of the world.

Our “panic now, avoid the rush” strategy is simple.

Take tech profits off the table, raise some cash, and focus on industry-leading companies that pay dividends. Roll those dividends up and use compounding to your overall portfolio’s advantage.

Mind Your Allocation In 2026
Dan Amoss: Perfect Competition Will Crush AI Profits

December 18, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

In a healthy economy, production and consumption communicate constantly. If a company builds something useful, customers respond by buying it. If they overbuild, inventories pile up and prices fall, sending a signal to slow down.

AI infrastructure, by contrast, is being built largely on faith. Companies are scaling up compute power without clear signs of sustainable demand. Unlike oil and gas, where prices adjust second-by-second, AI companies operate in a fog. They release tools, collect usage stats, and hope that paid conversions will follow.

But hope is not a business model.

Dan Amoss: Perfect Competition Will Crush AI Profits