GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Daily Missive

Full Speed Ahead

Loading ...Bill Bonner

January 14, 2025 • 3 minute, 15 second read


debtDOGE

Full Speed Ahead

Bill Bonner writing from Baltimore, Maryland

We came back from snowy Ireland to snow covered Maryland.

And this morning, we sit in front of the fire, and take a break from our customary rigorous analysis and air-tight logic to make some guesses.

As reported last week, the Musk/Ramaswamy DOGE group has already admitted that it can’t really eliminate the deficit. Not even half of it.

But it only took just a little math to see that coming, not a lot of guesswork. They would have to cut into the muscle of the Pentagon and into the guts of the transfer payments (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid) to really make much of a difference.

They aren’t going to do that because the politicians are in control, not the ‘efficiency’ guys. Politicos get power for themselves by spending money, not saving it. So, it was inevitable that Musk would fall out with the MAGA crowd.

Steve Bannon was on the case over the weekend. New York Post:

Days after fawning over what tech magnate Elon Musk’s deep pockets could do for the MAGA movement, Steve Bannon went berserk on the world’s richest man and vowed to limit his White House influence. Bannon, 71, who hosts the “War Room” podcast and has a penchant for plotting all-out brass-knuckled political warfare, suggested Musk “should go back to South Africa” and decried his stance on H1-B visas.

A bit more guessy is our hypothesis that the Trump phenomenon doesn’t mark a real break with the past… but merely an acceleration in the rate of degeneration. More spending. More debt. More blatant corruption. More foreign adventures. More inflation… and so forth.

The press confuses the issue. It says Trump represents the ‘extreme right’ as opposed to the mainstream ‘enlightened liberals.’ In the minds of many, the Trump win represents a whole new thing… a new era in US politics.

And in some ways it does. But not the important ones.

Perhaps less in practice than in theory, traditional party politics pitted the ‘progressives’ against the ‘conservatives.’ The improvers — a role played by the democrats — wanted to use the strong arm of the feds to build a better world. Spend, spend, spend… for better schools, welfare for the poor, make the world safe for democracy, save the planet — you name it.

The role played by conservative republicans was avuncular… dragging their feet to slow them down… and using the Constitution to impose restraints.

But over time, the wily old Republican uncles realized that they could use the government’s ‘free’ money to buy votes and gain power too. And now, is there a dime’s worth of difference between the two parties?

Both spend trillions they don’t have, knowing that it will lead to higher prices for their own voters… Both approved the invasion of Iraq… and the attack on Libya… and the bombs and cash that get sent to the Ukraine and Israel (much of which comes back to the US firepower industry… where a portion of it is then spent to guarantee more spending).

Where they disagree is not on the direction of the ship, but the color of carpet and the wine served at the captain’s table. Like married couples, they argue over the details…and often duck real differences. But it didn’t matter what song they played in the bar…when the icy water rushed through the corridors, the Titanic was doomed.

Bush, Obama, Trump I, Biden — none departed from the Big Empire course. And now Trump II is promising even more glorious expansion — to Greenland, Mexico, Canada… and perhaps teaming up with Mr. Musk… to the stars!

We’re all passengers on this ship, whether we like it or not. Where will we end up? East, West, South or North? The best guess is that it will go down.

More to come…

Regards,

Bill Bonner


Socialist Economics 101

August 28, 2025 • Lau Vegys

When we compare apples to apples—median home prices to median household income, both annualized—we get a much more nuanced picture. Housing has indeed become less affordable, with the price-to-income ratio climbing from roughly 3.5 in 1984 to about 5.3 today. In other words, the typical American family now has to work much harder to afford the same home.

But notice something crucial: the steepest increases coincide precisely with periods of massive government intervention. The post-dot-com bubble recovery fueled by Fed easy money after 2001. The housing bubble inflated by government-backed mortgages and Fannie Mae shenanigans. The recent explosion driven by unprecedented monetary stimulus and COVID lockdown policies.

Socialist Economics 101
Nvidia, Buybacks, and the Market’s Blind Faith

August 28, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

It’s hardly a secret that the national debt has surpassed $37 trillion.

This morning, the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, released a survey showing 79% of Americans say they are deeply concerned about the fiscal outlook, across party lines. The Fiscal Confidence Index sits at 49 — well below neutral.

The public sees what the market ignores: pressure on interest rates, inflation risk, and a government living beyond its means.

Nvidia, Buybacks, and the Market’s Blind Faith
Andrew Zatlin: Time for an AI Pause?

August 28, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Yes,  growth is slowing down. What can you expect when  you have 50% growth happening year over year over year?

At some point in time that stops.

We’re seeing the first signs of that with Nvidia reporting a slowdown in AI server revenues – but that’s hardly reflected in the market price yet.

Andrew Zatlin: Time for an AI Pause?
Andrew Zatlin: Trump’s Battle with the Phantom Economy

August 27, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

So right now, jobless claims are in a sweet spot that coincides with a pretty decent economy, 225,000 plus or minus.

Why are they hovering so low? And the reason I believe has to do with fear of deportation.

I believe that the Hispanic community is not applying for the jobless benefits that they’re entitled to because they are afraid of being deported. There are lots and lots of anecdotes out there of workers showing up at a government agency and being nabbed by ICE and being deported.

So rather than run the risk of deportation, these folks would rather run the risk of just not having as much money in their pocket from being eligible for jobs claims and not filing. Lemme explain by talking about California. In general, nationally right now, jobless claims are up about 10% year over year, except when we talk California, and that’s where everything signals under reporting.

Andrew Zatlin: Trump’s Battle with the Phantom Economy