GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

DeepSeek: The Pin “No One” Saw Coming

Loading ...Addison Wiggin

January 28, 2025 • 6 minute, 11 second read


AIDeepSeekdotcomvaluation

DeepSeek: The Pin “No One” Saw Coming

“The internet bubble circa 2000 is the most extreme in modern capitalism.” [That is, until AI took its place].

— Charlie Munger


 

January 28, 2025 — We began our financial writing career in 1997, investigating the root cause of the dotcom bubble… and the subsequent bust that began in 2000.

If you’ve been following along for a decade or more, from the very founding of the email letter The Daily Reckoning in the late 1990s, you know we’ve written bestselling books on the subject. We try to share our insights daily; sometimes, they seem larger than life and hard to grapple with.

Booms thrive on the spark of technological innovation and the fuel of financial speculation, igniting visions of endless progress. In Financial Reckoning Day, we warned that cheap credit and wild bets inflate these dreams, convincing everyone “this time is different.”

Later, in Empire of Debt, we continued the work. We observed that the very innovations that inspire confidence — railroads, dot-coms, AI — become the fault lines when speculation cracks. Every boom and bust shows how greed, cloaked as progress, sets the stage for disaster​​.

The winds of political change get whipped up over the roiling tumult of the economy. Individual investors are subject to paradigm shifts in the economy and in politics. Those who aren’t aware or prepared become the unintended victims of change… the collateral damage.

It’s our mission at Grey Swan to identify the tectonic shifts that distinguish fortune from despair. The episode that began with DeepSeek a few short days ago seems like a moment we ought to pay attention to.

The dotcom era had its heroes — Amazon, eBay, and even Pets.com (briefly). The AI boom of today has Nvidia, Microsoft, and a host of startups promising to reshape the world.

But let me take you back to a spring morning in March 2000. The Nasdaq hit 5,132.52, and investors popped corks, certain the party would never end.

By April 17, the Nasdaq was down to 3,227. Over the next 30 months, it crashed 78% from its peak, bottoming out near 1,100. The pin? A sudden realization: growth projections were built on hype, not profits.

Fast forward to today, and you can’t help but feel the eerie parallels. AI mania has pushed tech stocks into the stratosphere. Nvidia, the darling of the moment, has seen valuations soar on the promise of chips that drive machine learning. And Nvidia’s valuation is now far in excess of dotcom-era darling Cisco:

Turn Your Images On

We’ve been tracking this move since the inception of Grey Swan, mindful of what happens when this bubble bursts.

But here’s the question keeping me up at night: Could DeepSeek, the AI-powered trading app, be the pin this time?

Back in 2000, investors weren’t just burned — they were blindsided.

Many had believed the hype until the very end. As someone who lived through it, I saw how quickly optimism turned to panic. The dotcom crash wiped out $5 trillion in market value, and the psychological toll was even greater. Investors didn’t just lose money; they lost faith.

DeepSeek’s arrival smacks of the fuzzy promises of those days.

The app is billed as a revolutionary tool capable of analyzing markets and predicting moves in real-time. In theory, it could give retail investors an edge. But history teaches us that the more powerful the disruptor, the more fragile the market it disrupts.

We’ve been writing about Nvidia’s vulnerability for months, even as it gathered accolades for driving the tech sector to new record closes… and “hoovering” up capital from investment funds around the global financial system.

Now comes the pin “no one saw coming” – another phrase popular when Cisco crashed early in the dotcom bust or Lehman Bros. followed suit less than a decade later.

“No one,” experience tells us includes the financial media pundits whose job it is to create soundbites so they can deliver eyeballs to advertisers. “No one” does not include anyone who is actually paying attention to how markets, manias and mayhem actually happen.

Imagine this scenario: DeepSeek users pile into AI stocks en masse, driving valuations even higher. Then, in a moment of market turbulence, the algorithms pivot, triggering automated sell-offs. Retail investors, caught off guard, panic and dump shares. The result? A domino effect reminiscent of 2000.

The fallout would be catastrophic. Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, IRAs, and 401(k)s — many of which are heavily invested in tech, even if in passive vehicles like market index funds — could take devastating hits.

Consider pension funds, already teetering under unfunded liabilities. A collapse in AI valuations could send them into insolvency. Retirees relying on annuities might find their payouts slashed.

Sovereign wealth funds, particularly those in the Middle East, are betting heavily on AI as part of their diversification strategies. If the AI bubble bursts, these nations could face financial upheaval just as oil revenues continue to dwindle.

And let’s not forget individual investors. Many have poured their savings into tech ETFs, riding the AI wave with little thought to diversification. If the bubble bursts, it could take years — or decades — for them to recover.

The sideways movement in the markets right now feels like a warning sign. Markets are trying to shrug off the DeepSeek news as quickly as it moved in. But the AI rollout is here to stay – and now it’s clear there’s global competition. It won’t just be the big-cap U.S.-based tech giants that benefit.

DeepSeek, while innovative, adds a psychological twist: it amplifies market sentiment. If it works as advertised, it could drive prices to unsustainable highs. But if it falters, the ensuing panic could set off a chain reaction no algorithm can stop.

During the dotcom bust, the lesson was clear: bubbles don’t just destroy wealth; they redistribute it. Those who saw the crash coming and positioned themselves wisely emerged stronger. The dollar – the currency you calculate your own wealth in – is equally in jeopardy.

So what do you do now? Today, the same principle applies as it did in the early part of the millennium: Diversify your portfolio. Add hard assets like gold or real estate. Consider crypto. Focus on defensive sectors like dividend-paying consumer staples and energy utilities.

Most importantly, don’t chase the crowd. DeepSeek may be a marvel, but it could also be the pin that pops this AI bubble. And if it isn’t, today’s valuations – and historic concentration in a few companies at the top – suggest another pin is on its way.

In times like these, staying grounded is the best way to protect — and grow — your wealth.

Regards,


Addison Wiggin,
Grey Swan

P.S. If you’ve ever been to Times Square on New Year’s Eve, you know it’s all lights and confetti until the clock strikes midnight. The,n the cleanup crew arrives. That’s where we are in the market. The AI and tech bubbles have been the party, but the hangover is inevitable.

Investors love a good story, AI is (still) the hottest one in town. But as history teaches us, no story lasts forever. From the dot-com bust to the 2008 housing crisis, bubbles don’t pop quietly.

They burst.

The detritus doesn’t just land on Wall Street. The slime gets slathered all over Main Street, too.

As always, your cheerful reader feedback is welcome:  addison@greyswanfraternity.com. (We read all emails. Thanks in advance for your contribution.)


Dan Amoss: Perfect Competition Will Crush AI Profits

December 18, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

In a healthy economy, production and consumption communicate constantly. If a company builds something useful, customers respond by buying it. If they overbuild, inventories pile up and prices fall, sending a signal to slow down.

AI infrastructure, by contrast, is being built largely on faith. Companies are scaling up compute power without clear signs of sustainable demand. Unlike oil and gas, where prices adjust second-by-second, AI companies operate in a fog. They release tools, collect usage stats, and hope that paid conversions will follow.

But hope is not a business model.

Dan Amoss: Perfect Competition Will Crush AI Profits
The Second American Revolution Will Be Digitized, Update

December 18, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Six months ago — before the GENIUS Act was signed and before Washington put a nameplate on what had already begun — we were describing a slow rewiring of money.

For better or worse, we called it Dollar 2.0: the quiet migration of finance from paper promises and batch settlement to tokens, smart contracts, and ledgers that never sleep.

The name Dollar 2.0 is derived from the way Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been touting the stablecoin environment’s promise to create a larger global market for U.S. dollars and Treasurys.

The Second American Revolution Will Be Digitized, Update
“Sharks” and “Whales” Buy the Bitcoin Dip

December 18, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

The last 30 days have seen sharks (those with 100-1,000 BTC) and whales (1,000 BTC+) pick up over $23.3 billion in bitcoin.

If our Dollar 2.0 thesis is correct, it’s not actually easy to see why.

What’s seen: Congress passed laws to support stablecoin technology in time for America’s 250th anniversary next July.

What’s not seen: a 216-hour series of technical moves from November 22 to December 2, during which BlackRock, Vanguard, and Bank of America flipped switches that “captured” bitcoin into institutional-grade wrappers and distribution. JPMorgan followed up with a tokenized money market fund called MONEY on December 15.

“Sharks” and “Whales” Buy the Bitcoin Dip
Dan Amoss: Fixing the Resource Curse

December 17, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

The dollar-centric system and its bubbles may have given the U.S. economy a form of Dutch disease. This system has many rarely debated costs that go along with its benefits.

Deficit spending and stimulus inflated prices for stocks, real estate, and consumer goods. Trillions in savings remain in accounts from stimulus bills.

Without this spending, prices would be lower, a point lost on the Biden administration’s hyper-Keynesian economists, who never met a spending bill they did not cheer.

Dan Amoss: Fixing the Resource Curse