GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Beneath the Surface

A New ‘Golden Age’ for America?

Loading ...Andrew Packer

November 11, 2024 • 3 minute, 52 second read


debtelectionTrump

A New ‘Golden Age’ for America?

Bill Bonner, writing today from Baltimore, Maryland

 

“I will not rest until we have delivered the strong, safe and prosperous America that our children deserve and that you deserve,” said Donald Trump in his victory speech. “This will truly be the golden age of America. That’s what we have to have. This is a magnificent victory for the American people that will allow us to make America great again.”

—President elect Donald Trump

 

Big man. Big promise. Can he make good on it?

Nobody knows the future. Certainly not us! Instead, we bet on the patterns of history — in politics and markets — and hope for the best. Those patterns suggest that The Donald will face long odds.

Fairly soon, the Trump Team will be confronted by a credit crisis.

Budget deficits are expected to run about $2 trillion per year over the next four years. Interest on the debt is already running at $1 trillion per year. Plus, the federal government will have to refinance about $4 trillion per year in existing debt, every year.

Elon Musk, genius of universal renown, can do the math. But if he thinks he’s going to cut $2 trillion of deficit spending by eliminating ‘waste’ from federal spending he has a staggering lack of cynicalism.

No chance.

Donald Trump has already pledged to spare the essential parts of the Welfare/Warfare program (the Pentagon, Social Security and Medicare) — leaving only about 18% of the budget exposed to the knife. Even if you cut all of it, you’d still have a deficit of nearly $1 trillion.

In addition, Trump proposes to eliminate federal taxes on Social Security recipients, veterans, first responders, people who earn tips, and federal employees’ overtime pay. Together, these should widen the federal budget deficit by about $11.5 trillion in revenue loss over the next 10 years — or about a third of all revenue.

This lost revenue Trump plans to replace by taxing imports… with a 20% across the board tax and a 60% tax on imports from China.

We interrupt to point out that a tax on imports is really a tax on consumption. So, consumers would feel the pain right away… and know the cause of it, unlike the Fed’s money-printing inflation, whose effects take years to be felt.

This would also discourage people from spending money and encourage them to save… thereby potentially lowering real interest rates, while increasing savings. Over the long run, implemented properly, these changes could help make a stronger economy. 

But Mr. Trump and his entourage can’t afford to look into the distant future. They’ve got a four-year term. And any changes they make will  be revised, corrupted and perverted by Washington’s slimy swamp critters (working hard to get exceptions, exemptions, and special treatments).

And the last time the US implemented a sweeping tariff program was, not coincidentally, at the beginning of the Great Depression, not at the end of it. Reed Smoot and Willis Hawley should have never been allowed anywhere near Congress. But their tariff proposal became law in 1930. The foreigners responded with tariffs of their own. And soon world trade was reduced by some 67%… and helped make the aforementioned depression so great.

Putting the chaos and unexpected consequences aside, however… the tariffs simply wouldn’t raise enough money. At present levels, they would generate about $9 trillion over the next 10 years — about $2.5 trillion short of the amount lost to the tax cuts. That loss would grow as the flood of imports turned into a trickle. And it would be added to the national debt, along with the already programmed increases that are expected to take the debt to over $50 trillion by 2034.

But the one big difference between today and Trump’s first term is that additional debt now costs additional money. Because the ‘bond vigilantes’ are back in the saddle. In 2016, bond yields had been falling for 36 years. The feds could borrow as much as they wanted… and their interest payments would generally go down, not up. Even as late as 2016-2020, Team Trump spent trillions… borrowed trillions… and ‘printed’ trillions as interest rates continued to fall.

But in July 2020, the vigilantes woke up. Inflation and interest rates soared. And investors became keenly aware that they could lose money in Treasury bonds as well as make it.

And now, in anticipation of Mr. Trump’s second act, investors are already demanding more interest to compensate for the inflation they see coming. These higher rates will raise the cost of financing the debt… slow the economy… and goad the administration and the Fed to take action.

That is when the Golden Age gets badly tarnished.

Stay tuned…

Regards,

Bill Bonner 


Joe Withrow: The Hollow Class, Part III

November 13, 2025 • Andrew Packer

What we’ve seen since 2008 is nothing short of a theft of the commons. Except it happened in little pieces that seemed unrelated at the time. But if we look at the story holistically, it all comes together.

When we step back and view the entire picture, what emerges is not just a story of market excesses and economic shifts. What we see is the gutting of middle America – be it intentional or otherwise.

Now the question is – are we going to see the restoration of the American middle class in the coming years… or are we going to watch everything devolve into a modern redux of the War Between the States, more commonly but mistakenly known as the American Civil War?

Joe Withrow: The Hollow Class, Part III
Performative Clowns

November 13, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Today’s Washington isn’t governed so much as stage-managed.

Politicians don’t solve problems; they perform them.

The current fixation is affordability — a word that will be repeated ad nauseam from now through the 2026 midterms, until it becomes as meaningless as “bipartisan.”

The script hasn’t changed in decades: promise relief, pass a law that raises costs, blame capitalism, hold hearings, fundraise, repeat.

Performative Clowns
A Bubble in Bubble Talk

November 13, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Yes, Nvidia’s profits are up 500%, and its share price followed suit — a rare case where the story actually matches the math. But that’s the exception, not the rule.

Beneath the headlines, we’re starting to see the kind of financial gymnastics — circular lending, balance-sheet origami, and creative “partnerships” — that usually signal the boom is running out of breath.

If history rhymes, it looks like we’re closing in on the tail end of a mania.

A Bubble in Bubble Talk
The Hollow Class, Part II

November 12, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

As interest rates fell, investors swarmed into real estate, lured by yields and the illusion that home prices never fell. Wall Street’s private-label securitizers were soon packaging everything from pristine mortgages to what were effectively loans scribbled on napkins, thus turning them into bonds that glowed like gold — until you looked too closely.

For their part, the regulators and ratings agencies conveniently looked away and allowed the bubble to grow. Fannie Mae watched the frenzy from the sidelines at first.

The company’s mandate — written in law — was not to chase profits but to promote affordable housing. That is to say, to make sure that teachers, nurses, and other first-time buyers could own their own homes and unlock the American Dream.

But as Wall Street flooded the market with high-risk mortgage products, political pressure mounted. Congress demanded that Fannie “do its part” for low and moderate-income families.

The Hollow Class, Part II