Mag Seven Goes Bafooey

One of the most puzzling features of the 21st century is the almost total failure of its new technology… along with astonishing prices for the companies that produce it. Last year, the Visual Capitalist reported that the Magnificent Seven were worth nearly $16 trillion:

Since 2012, the first year all seven companies were public, the Magnificent Seven has grown 13.5 times larger. Nvidia has seen the highest relative growth, with its market cap jumping 360 times larger over the same time frame. Nvidia’s size is especially impressive when you compare its market cap to other chipmakers.

There is only so much ‘value’ or real wealth available in the world – cars, art, wool socks, beef ravioli. A man with a stock worth $100 has a claim on one hundred dollars’ worth of it. If his stock goes to $1,000…he can claim 10 times as much.

The Ford Motor company was valuable from the beginning — there were thousands of Ford trucks and autos to prove it. The company rose in value as its own output increased the nation’s real wealth. .

But what about those Magnificent Seven tech stocks? They are now worth $13 trillion more than in 2012. Where’s the beef?

The industrial age made us all much better off. No question about it.

The common chainsaw provides the easiest demonstration. It is a simple machine, little changed in the last half a century. We had one in the 1960s, which was already at least ten years old. It was big, heavy and noisy… but it did the job. Today, they are lighter and more reliable.

A small internal combustion engine takes gasoline (usually mixed with oil… in 2-stroke engines) and cranks a shaft that turns a sharpened chain. With it, in one day you can cut as much firewood as would have taken weeks or even months before.

The amount of fuel used is trivial. The pile of wood is impressive.

Firewood is a real thing… with real value… it warms our houses, greatly improving the quality of life. The chainsaw’s value can be measured by the cords of wood it cuts. More firewood = more value.

Almost everything that now creates our quality of life — automobiles, houses, food, clothing — relies on Industrial Age innovations.

Each one took a combination of labor (including the invention… design… and development… as well as actual manufacturing) and capital. It took a lot of money to build the factories… and the power grid, delivery systems, railroads and highways that brought the chainsaws into the local hardware stores. Even the movies we watch on our computer screens still require huge amounts of real things — fuel, time, props, transportation, lodging — to make.

And for each of these things, there is output to justify the capital value. More cars. More pants. More films.

Then came the Internet… and the communications revolution, largely built out in the 1990s. Widely discussed was the promise that ubiquitous information would reduce the need for capital. Rather than trial and error… hit or miss… entrepreneurs would have the world’s knowledge at their fingertips and could avoid dead ends and mistakes.

Capitalists would no longer need to take the risk of financing new projects, since the risk would be largely eliminated by knowledge. Growth rates would pick up. And the knowledge peddlers would be the new store of value.

That didn’t happen. Growth rates slowed. Most of the dot.coms disappeared. It turned out, they weren’t really offering ‘knowledge,’ but just information, and much of it was false, misleading, or unnecessary. In other words, it was a waste of time – squandering our most precious asset.

The dot.coms blew up 25 years ago. How much of the new tech, developed since then is a genuine improvement? How much is just nuisance?

Checking in to our nifty ‘health portal’ at Johns Hopkins hospital, for example, we were told that our password was incorrect. Then giving our name and birthday, the machine told us that our information was ‘invalid,’ as if it knew when we were born better than we did. But try to get a straight answer from an AI-enhanced communications system!

Our home heating system wouldn’t work. The Industrial Age part was still functioning — plenty of fuel… plenty of spark. But the ‘electronics’ had gone bafooey. Same thing happened with one of our trucks. Engine, no problem. But an electronic control had tripped, immobilizing the truck until a technician finally figured out the problem.

Today, if you have a flat tire, can AI fix it? Not as far as we know. The most obvious and helpful new developments to come out of the Information Age are the many short videos that show you how to do non-electronic things, such as change a tire. They also make it easy to ‘find a garage near you’ and make a restaurant reservation for the evening.

And so, on this cold, wintry day, warmed by the wood burning in our own fireplace, we pace the hardwood floor and fake Aubusson rug. We lean back in our plastic office chair… we tap our fingers on the mahogany desk… take a sip of hot tea from a ceramic cup, stare at the plaster molding around the ceiling…

And wonder — are the techs really worth as much as they think they are?

Where is that $13 trillion pile of wood?

Stay tuned…

Regards,

Bill Bonner

Since 2012, the first year all seven companies were public, the Magnificent Seven has grown 13.5 times larger. Nvidia has seen the highest relative growth, with its market cap jumping 360 times larger over the same time frame. Nvidia’s size is especially impressive when you compare its market cap to other chipmakers.

But what about those Magnificent Seven tech stocks? They are now worth $13 trillion more than in 2012. Where’s the beef?

The industrial age made us all much better off. No question about it.

The amount of fuel used is trivial. The pile of wood is impressive.

Firewood is a real thing… with real value… it warms our houses, greatly improving the quality of life. The chainsaw’s value can be measured by the cords of wood it cuts. More firewood = more value.

Almost everything that now creates our quality of life — automobiles, houses, food, clothing — relies on Industrial Age innovations.

And for each of these things, there is output to justify the capital value. More cars. More pants. More films.

The dot.coms blew up 25 years ago. How much of the new tech, developed since then is a genuine improvement? How much is just nuisance?

And wonder — are the techs really worth as much as they think they are?

Where is that $13 trillion pile of wood?

Stay tuned…

Regards,

Bill Bonner

America has consistently reinvented itself in times of crisis. The founders survived monarchy. Lincoln survived disunion. We’ve survived bank panics, oil shocks, stagflation, and disco. We’ll survive deplatforming, too.

The Second American Revolution won’t be fought with muskets or manifestos. It won’t be fought with petty violence and street demonstrations. It will be written into code. And available to those who wish to take advantage of it.

Russell Kirk called the first American Revolution “a revolution not made, but prevented.” The second will be the same. We’re not tearing down the house — we’re going to rewire it in code.

The result may not be utopia. But it will be freedom you can bank on.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called stablecoins, including USDC, “a pillar of dollar strength,” estimating a $2 trillion market within five years. U.S. Treasuries back every coin.

Bessent’s formula even suggests that a broader, more efficient market for US dollars will help retain its best use case as the reserve currency of global finance… and, perhaps, help the current administration address the nation’s $37 trillion mountain of debt.

In trying to cancel a man, the establishment accidentally reinforced the dollar, and may add decades to its life as a useful currency.

As we approach the 250th anniversary of the United States, it’s worth recalling that our first Revolution wasn’t waged to destroy an order — it was fought to preserve one.

Political philosopher Russell Kirk called it “a revolution not made but prevented.” The colonists sought not chaos but continuity — the defense of their “chartered rights as Englishmen,” not the birth of an entirely new world. Kirk wrote:

“The American Revolution was a preventive movement, intended to preserve an old constitutional structure. The French Revolution meant the destruction of the fabric of society.”

The difference, Kirk argued, was moral. The American Revolution was rooted in ordered liberty; the French in ideological frenzy. The first produced a Constitution; the second, a guillotine.

Two and a half centuries later, the argument continues — only now, the battlefield is financial. Who controls access to money? Who defines legitimacy? Can a citizen’s ability to transact depend on their politics?

Trump and Powell are no buddies. They’ve been fighting over rate cuts all year—Trump demanding more, Powell holding back. Even after cutting twice, Trump called him “grossly incompetent” and said he’d “love to fire” him. The tension has been building for months.

And Trump now seems ready to install someone who shares his appetite for lower rates and easier money.

Trump has been dropping hints for weeks—saying on November 18, “I think I already know my choice,” and then doubling down last Sunday aboard Air Force One with, “I know who I am going to pick… we’ll be announcing it.”

He was referring to one Kevin Hassett, who—according to a recent Bloomberg report—has emerged as the overwhelming favorite to become the next Fed chair.