GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2025 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Daily Missive

Janet Yellen: The U.S. Government’s Worst DEI Hire

Loading ...Andrew Packer

January 10, 2025 • 3 minute, 32 second read


economyT-billstreasury bondsU.S. TreasuryYellen

Janet Yellen: The U.S. Government’s Worst DEI Hire

~~ Andrew Packer, Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

It’s just about Joe-ver. We’re days away from the Biden administration driving off into the sunset, or whatever direction the 46th President’s hospice care is relative to the White House.

As we reflect on Biden’s years of inflation, fueled in part by spending bills named the “Inflation Reduction Act,” it’s important to note that the U.S. government has been rigged for a crisis not long after Donald Trump returns to office.

Why? Janet Yellen, the departing Treasury Secretary, is the reason.

She’s deliberately booby-trapped the economy over the past year. And if things don’t go well, this sucker could blow.

Make no mistake: This is deliberate. Yellen is smart. She got her BA at Brown, her MA at Yale, and taught at Harvard and U.C. Berkley before moving into the bureaucracy of the Federal Reserve.

President Obama tapped her to lead the Fed after Ben Bernanke. In that role, Yellen showed tremendous caution, taking her time to gradually raise interest rates a quarter point at a time.

But it’s her recent actions at Treasury Secretary that pose a huge problem. Yellen took over in 2021. Interest rates were still at zero. Investors, particularly institutional investors, were still risk-averse.

The Treasury had a fantastic opportunity to issue 50-year bonds at a relatively low rate. But Yellen didn’t follow through and make a tough choice.

Instead of charting a new course, Yellen has focused the Treasury on meeting its funding needs with short-term bills.

Interest rates have been trending higher, which is a problem. For most of 2023 and 2024, the real issue is that short-term bills, thanks to the inverted yield curve, carried a higher cost than longer-dated securities.

By focusing on issuing short-term bills, the U.S. government has an increasing cash flow problem. Larger and larger amounts of money are coming due each month. A stronger mix of longer-dated securities would alleviate this rollover problem.

What’s truly bizarre is that Yellen made these moves when Biden was still running for re-election. And Yellen didn’t change course after Kamala Harris stepped in following Biden’s withdrawal. That’s why this appears to be genuine incompetence and not just a political maneuver to harm the incoming Trump administration.

Meanwhile, as we enter 2025, five-year bonds from the pandemic low yields of 2020 are now starting to roll over at rates close to 4.5%, compared to 0.1% when they were initially bought. That’s a massive jump in borrowing costs for Uncle Sam.

Adding in the high costs of issuing short-term debt during an inverted yield curve and refinancing pandemic-era low yields, it’s clear that Yellen’s short-term focus is costing the U.S. billions of dollars in extra interest it wouldn’t have to pay otherwise each year.

It’s no wonder that there are now estimates that Uncle Sam will have to shell out $2 trillion in interest payments on the debt soon after hitting $1 trillion in annual payments for the first time.

Like many other members of Biden’s cabinet, Yellen was likely chosen for her party loyalty and for ticking the right diversity boxes.

As corporate America and the incoming Trump administration look to scale back from DEI—diversity, equity, and inclusion—standards and move back to the American historical trend of meritocracy, Yellen will go down in history books for her incompetence in overpaying to fund the government.

Future Treasury Secretaries who screw up likely won’t be able to screw up on the scale as Yellen has in just four short years (although they’ll probably try).

It didn’t have to be this way.

Time will tell how Donald Trump’s Secretary of the Treasury pick, Scott Bessent, will fare. But he’ll likely be dealing with a crisis sooner rather than later. And a debt crisis can quickly spiral out of control in unforeseen ways.

Given the rising mix of short-term debt, it could truly create a real crisis. After all, finance textbooks and theories state that U.S. T-bills are the only truly risk-free asset.

Sadly, that thought may face a real test in 2025, and become the top Grey Swan event of the year. ~~ Andrew Packer, Grey Swan Investment Fraternity


Porter Stansberry: Anatomy of an Asymmetric Bet

September 11, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

It’s one of those rare situations Warren Buffett would describe as “raining gold”… when all you have to do is step outside if you want to get rich. And it’s the type of setup Erez has built his entire investing career around. 

The type of opportunity with the potential to make you a small fortune.

Porter Stansberry: Anatomy of an Asymmetric Bet
American Pathology

September 11, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

Twenty-four years ago, today, nearly 3,000 people died in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. But the toll hasn’t stopped. The FDNY has now lost more members to 9/11-related illnesses than it did on the day itself. This week, the department added 39 names to its Memorial Wall, bringing the total to 402.

Mayor Eric Adams spoke plainly: “We need to humanize what happened those 24 years ago and not allow time to erode how significant it was. The countless number of men and women ran towards danger, and we’re still losing their lives every day.”

America’s story, from Lincoln to JFK to 9/11 to now, is scarred by episodes of violence that rupture legitimacy. Each event has reshaped institutions, politics, and markets.

And in the age of hyper-partisan politics, global debt, and technological acceleration.

American Pathology
The Income Effect

September 11, 2025 • Addison Wiggin

A company can restate its earnings – but they can’t restate a cash dividend.

Plus, dividend growth companies tend to offer lower beta, or volatility relative to the market itself.

Finally, as Jeremy Siegel has documented in Stocks for the Long Run, over an investor’s lifetime, reinvesting dividends can account for over half of an investor’s total returns.

With the growing likelihood of a terrifying bull market in stocks kicking off, investors can get a relative safe-haven with dividend-paying stocks.

The Income Effect
What If the “Scaling Cliff” Pops the AI Bubble?

September 10, 2025 • John Rubino

In just the past five years, nearly a trillion dollars have been thrown at AI data centers, chip plants, and model training. And the spending curve continues to steepen, as pretty much every tech firm and most governments enter the AI arms race.

Early AIs improved in line with the amount of computing power and new data they were fed. This led to the assumption that AI investment had a predictable rate of return (which investors absolutely love).

But with the most recent iterations of name-brand AI, that relationship has broken down. They’re not improving in line with the money being spent on them, leading a growing number of analysts to voice doubt about whether the return on this investment can be predicted going forward. This is known as the “scaling cliff.”

What If the “Scaling Cliff” Pops the AI Bubble?