“The Great Depression, like most other periods of severe unemployment, was produced by government mismanagement rather than by any inherent instability of the private economy.”

–Milton Friedman

September 20, 2024 – Pity the saver. Sacrificed at the altar of R* again.

R*, or R-star, is the elusive “neutral” rate in which central bankers “don’t” put their thumb on the scale… in the markets, in the economy or in politics.

It’s the central banker’s perfectly balanced elixir. It cures inflation and promotes maximum employment. And allows them to sleep at night.

As you would expect, following Wednesday’s 50-point rate cut, the media proved once again that opinions are like… well, you know. Everyone has one.

The trouble is, R* is unknowable in real time. So the chattering class goes about its own business of asserting what they would do if they were Jerome Powell.

Savers, who were getting paid a fair wage for their money while the Fed overtly battled inflation, will once again be punished by lower income, and ultimately pushed to speculate in stocks to maintain their purchasing power.

Money markets and CDs immediately started pricing lower in the 7, 10 and 13-month window. But major indexes reached fresh all-time highs.

Imagine, for a moment, trying to explain, briefly, to your 18-year old daughter why she should save her money by locking it up for 7 months in a CD while she’s away at college.

Ahem.

Below, William Luther, writing for the American Institute for Economic Research, articulates, briefly, who prevailed in the markets while the Fed went about dot-plotting its next move.

Gold, for what it’s worth, proved again it’s the only asset that is also nobody’s liability. This morning, it topped out at its own fresh historic high of $2,646 in early trading. Enjoy. ~~Addison

Fed Rate Cuts: Better Late Than Never

William Luther, American Institute for Economic Research

What we know. The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced a 50 basis point cut in its federal funds rate target on Wednesday.

The move marks a reversal at the Fed, which had held its target rate range at 5.25 to 5.5 percent since July 2023. FOMC members previously worried high inflation might become entrenched. They now believe inflation is on a path back to 2 percent, thereby warranting a gradual transition from tight to neutral monetary policy.

At the post-meeting press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the decision as “a process of recalibrating our policy stance away from where we had it a year ago when inflation was high and unemployment low to a place that’s more appropriate given where we are now and where we expect to be.”

Market participants were grappling with two big questions heading into Wednesday’s meeting. The immediate question was whether the Fed would cut its federal funds rate target range by 25 or 50 basis points. Just prior to Wednesday’s announcement, the CME Group reported that the federal funds futures market was pricing in a slight edge (55 percent) for the larger cut.

The longer term question concerned the pace of rate cuts.

Prior to the meeting, futures market traders were convinced the Fed would move quickly. The CME Group reported a 12.8 percent chance that the federal funds rate target range would be 150 basis points lower by the end of the year; a 51.0 percent chance it would be at least 125 basis points lower; and an 88.2 percent chance it would be at least 100 basis points lower.

The Fed’s decision to cut by 50 basis points on Wednesday and the projections for the federal funds rate submitted by FOMC members largely confirmed market expectations. The median FOMC member projected the midpoint of the federal funds rate target range would fall to 4.4 percent this year, which is consistent with a 4.25 to 4.5 percent target rate range. One FOMC member projected the federal funds rate would fall by an additional 75 basis points this year; nine members projected it would fall by an additional 50 basis points; seven projected it would fall by an additional 25 basis points; and two projected it would remain unchanged.

Given FOMC members’ projections for near-term rate cuts, Wednesday’s decision might be seen as an implicit acknowledgement that the Fed had gotten behind the curve. Inflation was 2.5 percent over the last twelve months, which is slightly above target. But it has averaged just 1.5 percent over the last three months and 0.9 percent in the most recent month.

Moreover, since our estimates of housing services prices adjust with a considerable lag, actual inflation—if it were possible to accurately measure it—is probably even lower. This lag caused conventional measures to underestimate inflation in 2021, when prices began rising rapidly. It has likely caused them to overestimate inflation in late 2023 and 2024, as prices began to grow more slowly.

Powell denied that the Fed was playing catch-up with its 50 basis point rate cut. “We don’t think we’re behind. We think this is timely. But I think you can take this as a sign of our commitment not to get behind.” Nonetheless, Powell acknowledged that the Fed might have cut in July had the data come in before that meeting rather than just after.

By conventional measures, monetary policy remains tight and will likely continue to remain tight over the near term if the Fed cuts rates in line with the median FOMC member’s projections. Indeed, Powell said “there’s no sense that the committee feels it’s in a rush” to return policy to neutral.

The New York Fed estimates the real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) neutral rate of interest at 0.74 to 1.22 percent. With the Fed’s 2-percent inflation target, that would imply a long run nominal neutral rate of interest of 2.74 to 3.22 percent. Correspondingly, the median FOMC member currently projects the midpoint of the longer run federal funds rate target range at 2.9 percent, which is consistent with a 2.75 to 3.0 percent target rate range. If the federal funds rate target range is 4.25 to 4.5 percent following the December meeting, as the median FOMC member currently projects, it will remain more than 100 basis points above the long run neutral federal funds rate.

Of course, we do not directly observe the neutral federal funds rate. But, as Chair Powell noted in the post-meeting press conference, “we know it by its works.” If incoming data suggests that monetary policy remains too tight, the Fed might respond by cutting its federal funds rate target faster than the median FOMC member currently projects.

“We are not on any preset course,” Powell said. “We will continue to make our decisions meeting by meeting.” The risk is that, given the long and variable lags of monetary policy, it will be too late to avoid a recession once the signs of a recession appear. ~~William Luther, American Institute for Economic Research

So it goes,

Addison Wiggin,

Grey Swan

P.S.: “Mr Wiggin, you know better,” the always astute Robert from Houston writes, writing in response to yesterday’s opening quote. “In 1912 JP said ‘Money is gold, and nothing else.’ And died 4 months later from the stress.

“Context matters: JP was being grilled (max hostile) before the Pujo subcommittee investigating the ‘Money Trust’. The answer is brilliantly evasive — repeating the US Constitution. And slyly provoking the Bryan bimetallists.”

Please send your comments, reactions, opprobrium, vitriol and praise to: addison@greyswanfraternity.com

“The Great Depression, like most other periods of severe unemployment, was produced by government mismanagement rather than by any inherent instability of the private economy.”

–Milton Friedman

September 20, 2024 – Pity the saver. Sacrificed at the altar of R* again.

R*, or R-star, is the elusive “neutral” rate in which central bankers “don’t” put their thumb on the scale… in the markets, in the economy or in politics.

It’s the central banker’s perfectly balanced elixir. It cures inflation and promotes maximum employment. And allows them to sleep at night.

As you would expect, following Wednesday’s 50-point rate cut, the media proved once again that opinions are like… well, you know. Everyone has one.

The trouble is, R* is unknowable in real time. So the chattering class goes about its own business of asserting what they would do if they were Jerome Powell.

Money markets and CDs immediately started pricing lower in the 7, 10 and 13-month window. But major indexes reached fresh all-time highs.

Imagine, for a moment, trying to explain, briefly, to your 18-year old daughter why she should save her money by locking it up for 7 months in a CD while she’s away at college.

Ahem.

Below, William Luther, writing for the American Institute for Economic Research, articulates, briefly, who prevailed in the markets while the Fed went about dot-plotting its next move.

Fed Rate Cuts: Better Late Than Never

William Luther, American Institute for Economic Research

What we know. The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced a 50 basis point cut in its federal funds rate target on Wednesday.

The longer term question concerned the pace of rate cuts.

So it goes,

Addison Wiggin,

Grey Swan

Please send your comments, reactions, opprobrium, vitriol and praise to: addison@greyswanfraternity.com

America has consistently reinvented itself in times of crisis. The founders survived monarchy. Lincoln survived disunion. We’ve survived bank panics, oil shocks, stagflation, and disco. We’ll survive deplatforming, too.

The Second American Revolution won’t be fought with muskets or manifestos. It won’t be fought with petty violence and street demonstrations. It will be written into code. And available to those who wish to take advantage of it.

Russell Kirk called the first American Revolution “a revolution not made, but prevented.” The second will be the same. We’re not tearing down the house — we’re going to rewire it in code.

The result may not be utopia. But it will be freedom you can bank on.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called stablecoins, including USDC, “a pillar of dollar strength,” estimating a $2 trillion market within five years. U.S. Treasuries back every coin.

Bessent’s formula even suggests that a broader, more efficient market for US dollars will help retain its best use case as the reserve currency of global finance… and, perhaps, help the current administration address the nation’s $37 trillion mountain of debt.

In trying to cancel a man, the establishment accidentally reinforced the dollar, and may add decades to its life as a useful currency.

As we approach the 250th anniversary of the United States, it’s worth recalling that our first Revolution wasn’t waged to destroy an order — it was fought to preserve one.

Political philosopher Russell Kirk called it “a revolution not made but prevented.” The colonists sought not chaos but continuity — the defense of their “chartered rights as Englishmen,” not the birth of an entirely new world. Kirk wrote:

“The American Revolution was a preventive movement, intended to preserve an old constitutional structure. The French Revolution meant the destruction of the fabric of society.”

The difference, Kirk argued, was moral. The American Revolution was rooted in ordered liberty; the French in ideological frenzy. The first produced a Constitution; the second, a guillotine.

Two and a half centuries later, the argument continues — only now, the battlefield is financial. Who controls access to money? Who defines legitimacy? Can a citizen’s ability to transact depend on their politics?

Trump and Powell are no buddies. They’ve been fighting over rate cuts all year—Trump demanding more, Powell holding back. Even after cutting twice, Trump called him “grossly incompetent” and said he’d “love to fire” him. The tension has been building for months.

And Trump now seems ready to install someone who shares his appetite for lower rates and easier money.

Trump has been dropping hints for weeks—saying on November 18, “I think I already know my choice,” and then doubling down last Sunday aboard Air Force One with, “I know who I am going to pick… we’ll be announcing it.”

He was referring to one Kevin Hassett, who—according to a recent Bloomberg report—has emerged as the overwhelming favorite to become the next Fed chair.