GSI Banner
  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Grey Swan Forecasts
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Join Now

  • Free Access
  • Contributors
  • Membership Levels
  • Grey Swan Forecasts
  • Video
  • Origins
  • Sponsors
  • Contact

© 2026 Grey Swan Investment Fraternity

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Whitelist Us
Swan Dive

The Resource War That Could Outlast the AI Bubble

Addison WigginAddison Wiggin

November 4, 2026 • 4 minute, 47 second read


AIbubbleGovernmentstockstech

The Resource War That Could Outlast the AI Bubble

AI companies are competing for capital at the top of the financial system. As I discussed yesterday, governments are competing for copper, uranium, rare earths, energy and industrial capacity underneath it.

Even an investor who believes he owns neither the AI trade nor the “Sovereign Bloc” directly is exposed to both through an index fund, pension, insurer, bank, bond fund or the companies in his retirement account.

And further through taxation, dysfunctional politics, exploding government debt, and rising Treasury yields.

⛏️ The Sovereign Bloc Goes Shopping

The potential disaster awaiting AI finance has a built-in mitigating factor.

Even if investors eventually decide that somebody built too many data centers, the physical scramble for metals, critical minerals and rare earths underneath them is not confined to Silicon Valley.

Governments – “sovereigns,” in the parlance of Wall Street – now want many of the same materials for defense, energy security and industrial policy.

Turn Your Images On

If the AI boom turns into an expensive exercise in overbuilding, plenty of investors will be left holding the bag. But the scramble for the materials underneath that boom isn’t going away. (Source: Insightace Analytic)

Last week in London, I attended the Financial Times Metals & Mining Summit. Robert Friedland, founder of Ivanhoe Mines and one of the mining industry’s more entertaining truth-tellers, captured the atmosphere with a line I scribbled down immediately.

They might as well have called it the “FT Metals and Defense Summit.”

In a brief private conversation we had with Friedland following his short appearance on stage, he said to me when I asked if he was concerned about the debt for hyperscalers causing a price distortion or a collapse of supply chains and demand for natural resources, precious metals, critical minerals or rare earths.

He laughed.

“Not at all. I know that idea has captured the media’s attention, but the situation is far more grave than the commercial application for the AI-generated porn industry. Governments are hoarding metals because they need them for defense as the global economy Balkanizes.”

“Of course, the hyperscalers will need the steel, too,” he said. “But the sovereign contest is far more urgent. And nobody in the press or commercial world understands the gravity of the historical epoch we’re in.”

Regarding President Trump and the midterm elections, he leaned in and lowered his voice.

“Don’t worry about one guy,” he put his hand on my shoulder, “he’s one guy!”

“The whole ‘permanent’ government — the Lockheed Martins of the world — are scrambling for resources.”

He had a point.

The Americans want domestic and allied supplies of copper, uranium, rare earths and specialty metals. European officials are trying to reduce their dependence on China.

Defense contractors need tungsten, antimony and rare-earth magnets. Technology executives are discovering that an AI strategy eventually becomes an electricity strategy and then, with almost comic inevitability, a mining strategy.

At the summit, mining executives described technology companies showing direct interest in securing long-term supplies of metals.

Governments, meanwhile, are increasingly supplying financing themselves. That is what I mean by the “Sovereign Bloc.”

Not one alliance or treaty. Governments themselves have become major customers, financiers and strategic investors in the base layer.

Turn Your Images On

If the AI bubble bursts, the data center builders may have some explaining to do. But the underlying resource scramble is a different animal. Governments and companies are competing for critical minerals, rare earths and energy supplies regardless of what happens next. (Source: Small Business Expo)

This does not repeal the business cycle. Governments can overpay as enthusiastically as private investors. But it does mean that the resource buildout has another buyer besides the AI promoter.

Which brings us to how we have structured Grey Swan for exactly this sort of environment.

📈 The Classical Investor

The Grey Swan Model Portfolio is the closest thing we have to classical investing.

When we constructed it with Zach Scheidt, we went back to research suggesting that an investor could obtain most of the practical benefit of diversification with roughly 20 carefully selected companies rather than owning several hundred businesses simply because an index committee happened to include them.

Our model divides those 20 positions into two groups. Fifteen are long-term income holdings: established companies selected to produce dividends and compound them. Five are more aggressive companies that still pay income but offer greater potential for capital appreciation.

There is, however, a large caveat.

We began building the portfolio in 2023, after the 2022 bear market had already knocked down valuations.

The portfolio has therefore enjoyed precisely the environment it was designed to enjoy. That does not make the companies bad companies today. It does mean that a rising market can make prudent portfolio construction look more brilliant than it really is.

Hence our continued obsession with the AI bubble.

The portfolio’s job is not to predict when the bubble will collapse. It is to own productive businesses for years and use “the 8th wonder of the modern world,” as Albert Einstein referred to “compounding,” to grow wealth.

Beyond that, our job as writers and thinkers is to notice when the price investors are willing to pay becomes detached from what those businesses can reasonably earn and contribute to your assets by paying you income.

~ Addison

P.S. A massive opportunity is brewing in the rare earth market…

On November 10, a small mining company focused on one of tech’s most coveted metals could become eligible for Nasdaq inclusion — potentially putting it in reach of $42 billion in institutional buying.

Right now, some of Wall Street’s biggest investors are locked out. But that could change in days.

We believe this stock could turn $10,000 into $200,000 by 2028 — a potential 20-bagger.

Don’t wait for institutional money to arrive. Watch this special presentation to learn about the company and how to get ahead of the November 10 deadline.


About Last Night…

November 4, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

Democrats swept Congress, but don’t mistake a political shake-up for a market meltdown. History has a different message.

About Last Night…
The Election Changes Nothing About the National Debt

November 4, 2026 • James Hickman

Don’t pin your hopes on election results. Politicians aren’t going to fix this. The incentive structure just isn’t there…

The Election Changes Nothing About the National Debt
The Next Big Market Collision Is Already Underway

November 3, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

AI infrastructure and government borrowing are competing for capital, and the outcome could completely reshape the investment landscape…

The Next Big Market Collision Is Already Underway
Why I Don’t Vote

November 3, 2026 • Addison Wiggin

The biggest problem with American democracy is who gets elected, but a century of voters expect payouts from Washington…

Why I Don’t Vote